It has been my experience too, also for digital and film cameras, over at least the last 15 years. The last time I sent Leica my M10M and lenses for service, I dropped them off in the first week of October and got them back in the last week of April the following year. I was mainly posting it because in several recent threads people had commented that Leica always got things back to them relatively quickly. This web information seems, to me, to be an admission of what I had observed; their service department is undergoing a success crisis.Umm, maybe I'm missing something, but my experience with Leica USA's turnaround was always like this, long before the "renaissance". Maybe it was better in Oz?
I agree....new digital M Leicas are $9000 USD/ € 8200..... 8 month for repairs is ludicrous.Every two years a replacement? Then I prefer a Leica film camera. I have one from 1928 that still works like new.
I think you’re looking at long repair times no matter who you send them to. A few years ago I sent a couple of lenses an an M3 to Youxin Ye. I think he turned them around in a couple of weeks. That was great service. DAG was a little longer but still reasonable.Leica has a long history of poor quality control and/or engineering. The original M8 had the notorious magenta issue with the 'fix' of UV/IR filters, later models first shipped with loose strap lugs, new M6 offers film scratches (no extra charge!), M11 firmware freezes (people on other forums have tried 4 and 5 bodies and still have issues), the infamous M9 sensor corrosion, 35 FLE II broken aperture blades, it goes on and on. And then the long service times are icing on the cake...
Yet while all this is going on they invest in a fancy new HQ...
I think you’re looking at long repair times no matter who you send them to. A few years ago I sent a couple of lenses an an M3 to Youxin Ye. I think he turned them around in a couple of weeks. That was great service. DAG was a little longer but still reasonable.
Over two months ago I sent three lenses to Youxin for cleaning but only received a notice that they were received and he’d contact me in two months. I’m in no rush but would like to get them back in another month.
Leica on the other hand has soured me on ever buying another Leica. My M9 experience, many trips in for warranty repair, and 90 Apo Summicron repair fiasco did the trick. Despite my being a full time professional and using Leica since 1968, they had no problems supplying complementary equipment to wealthy amateurs rather than working pros. In the r d the only way I was able to get things resolved was the treat of a lawsuit which at least got my camera temporarily repaired and my 90 replaced.
I decided at that point I was done with Leica. I kept my film gear but will not buy another Leica or lens. Nikon and Canon which I primarily used backup their pros with superb NPS or CPS service with 24 hour turnaround repairs at a discount and free equipment loans.
I’m retired now and still use Nikon and jumped into Fuji. I can throw a Fuji camera or lens in the trash for what a repair on a Leica costs. Are Leicas images better, no not really. Nikon & Canon are the choice of top pros for a reason and Fuji is quite capable.