Eric T
Well-known
Get the M2 fixed and use the "sunny 16" rule for metering.
And you still have the Bessa R2.
And you still have the Bessa R2.
It is the best M-Leica. It has the most precise frames (one at a time), an ideal not disturbing analog lightmeter (very sensible) and the best build quality of all the M-Leicas. Try one and you'll be convinced.
Erik.
"The M2 stays"
Good choice.
Get the M2 fixed and use the "sunny 16" rule for metering.
And you still have the Bessa R2.
Good choice on keeping the M2. I have to second the idea of an M5. It is the only M film body that I had never owned up to the MP/M7. I got one from Sherry, shot it for a week and returned it, primarily as I already owned two M2's. Well, a few weeks later I changed my mind, called her up to add the third lug and replace the vulcanite. Now, I am waiting for the camera.
It really does have the best metering of any Leica (owned both M6 and M6TTL) and currently own an M9 (M7 but digital). Being able to see the shutter speed in the viewfinder is great. It is a bit heavier then my M2's which I noticed. The slightly larger size went unnoticed and I figure it will mate well with my 35f1.2 beast.
Take a look at the VC meter if you cannot find an MR-4 to your liking. Being solid state it is a bit more shock proof. I use one on my M2 when I feel the need for a reflected light meter and it has the same field of view as a 90mm lens, just like the MR-4.
Good to keep the M2. Its just a great camera and you shouldn't feel like its "lesser" than the M6.
I have an M2 and an M6 (and an M3). My M6 is broken beyond economical repair. I haven't yet had the urge to repair it (and may never).
In the meantime, I've learned to love my M2. My exposures are reasonable, and my mental meter improves every time I take it out. I should say, however, that I've been using the mental meter (with more than just the M2) for more years than I care to admit, so I would hope I hit exposure more often than not.
For about a year now, I've been longing for another film M camera. One to work in tandem with my M9 (I like to use both film and digital, each to their strength). That "new" camera is almost certain to be an M6TTL. So........nobody rush out and start driving the prices up, OK? Of course, all depends on that fickle budget. Might be a while...
If you currently wear glasses or may ever need them, have Sherry change the eyepiece to the rubber coated M6 style. It's a small touch but worth it.
If you currently wear glasses or may ever need them, have Sherry change the eyepiece to the rubber coated M6 style. It's a small touch but worth it.
DAG sells a snap on plastic eyepiece guard for $15. Prevent scratching your glasses. Works great, looks stock.
Sherry's price of $500 for CLA + replacement of both curtains is ok.
Youxin Ye's price for the same is $420.
I've used both and recommend either.
I know you've already made the correct choice 😉 but as others have said, and you know, anyone new to you but old M camera (M6 definitely falls into this category) may need work.
I'd fix the M2 and buy an M6 as well because, .... I can't help myeslf. lol
Meanwhile, How many weeks can I live on noodles alone? 🙄
IF you're willing to pay for one or both of them, sure. But I don't have that kind of budget. It's Either-or.
Youxin Ye is very, very quick on the turn around time. I have had CLA's done and the camera back in ten days including shipping both ways. Sherry is good but I have been waiting a month for the M5.
Have used them both. Youxin Ye responds quickly to email while Sherry is erratic.
I would have sold the R2, the M2 and then bought an MA. 🙂
It is an improved M3/M2.
I'm sure that your spouse would have been much relieved.
I don't know why, but with Leica it is - get M2 fixed now, but M6 will come later. It is good to keep M2 for economical reasons. I have M4-2 and M4-P, but still want M2 🙂
I have an MA, M3 and M6.
M6 viewfinder flares so don't use it very often.
M3 viewfinder is not as clear as the MA so it doesn't get used very often. I do have to say though, the M3's chrome and vulcanite has stood up very well over time. Maybe I will have to get the viewfinder cleaned up when I get some money.
First comes the Elmar 90 collapsible and the Summicron 50 collapsible. I guess I better get in touch with Youxin.
My questions to you are:
1. Is the M6 superior or inferior to the M2 in any other ways besides the lightmeter?
2. Is my valuation of a needy M2 vs. a Decent M6 valid, as far as cost goes?
3. Would sticking with the meterless M, and using my Bessa for times when I really need the meter, make me a better photographer?
I just think that perhaps, of all the cameras I should have with a meter, the "Decisive Moment" M camera should be one of them.