I've made a huge mistake...

Having looked at the responses he got to his query over at the LUF, it’s obvious that he was getting more thoughtful and more detailed information about the characteristics of various lenses over there, without being sidetracked into a focus on cost. Plus, the tenor over there was frankly nicer, sad to say, that observation being hard to escape if one reads the threads from both forums.
Though I am aware that people over there tend to be less bothered by price points than they are here, and they just focus on the actual attributes of things and generally leave cost out of it. Though, that in itself just makes them “fanboys” to some.
Anyway, the different tenor of the threads on the two forums was interesting.
I don’t go over there much as it is too rich for my blood, but they do know their lenses.

Yeah, well they egg each other on to spend tens of thousands on this stuff, it's far more status over there so of course it would be a love fest.

It's a bit more tough love over here but there is also actual good photography where as LUF is more like bokeh tests, latte's and overexposed flat European blobs of non-subject.
 
Well, I’m learning even more. In the original thread I read us described as Calvinist. I liked that. Would you read anywhere other than here, something by I think Orville Robertson, many years ago, an M5 user in fact, that Leica is not “all about the glass”, but it’s about the rangefinder camera and its controls? And how about the Voigtlander 50 2.5 Color Skopar thread here? I’m happy.
 
Back
Top Bottom