ccstearns
Member
So, I have one 136xx that Sherry made new again and so now I am a M5 addict, no debate there. So much so, I bought another M5 but I might have gotten a dog. Here are my slew of NEUROTIC questions.
1. the one I got is a chrome 2 lug but SN 1345xx. Sherry in an email said, "You want an M5 with a serial number of 134 or higher, the early production were weak…(128, and 129)." At times, people say (here and other places) to only get 134 and higher, others say 135 and higher.
The question is this, was the 134 run as bad as the 128-129? Or, what is the real 'do not buy' zone? is only 128-129, or is it all of 134 too?
1a. It does seem like there is a period where the SN is above 134x and two lug, is that accurate?
2. Curiosity here. If one gets a 128-9, can Don/Sherry not make then usable or are they forever not viable? Or is it a cost vs practical question?
3. More curiosity/ research...I can't seems to track down SN 130 to 134, I would assume that this is shift in production? Has anyone done like real Leica history research into this? I'm an academic so this kind of thing is interesting to me.
1. the one I got is a chrome 2 lug but SN 1345xx. Sherry in an email said, "You want an M5 with a serial number of 134 or higher, the early production were weak…(128, and 129)." At times, people say (here and other places) to only get 134 and higher, others say 135 and higher.
The question is this, was the 134 run as bad as the 128-129? Or, what is the real 'do not buy' zone? is only 128-129, or is it all of 134 too?
1a. It does seem like there is a period where the SN is above 134x and two lug, is that accurate?
2. Curiosity here. If one gets a 128-9, can Don/Sherry not make then usable or are they forever not viable? Or is it a cost vs practical question?
3. More curiosity/ research...I can't seems to track down SN 130 to 134, I would assume that this is shift in production? Has anyone done like real Leica history research into this? I'm an academic so this kind of thing is interesting to me.