steveyork
Well-known
I'm betting a shorter rangefinder base too to help differentiate from MA/MP. They don't want to canibilize sales from other new offerings.
They can’t keep up with orders for the MA/MP so why would they cannibalize the line to make a lower price point M? Makes no business sense.
In what world could this ever be possible? Note they said "cheaper" not cheap.
Leica news is where you find it.
Remember the only new digital Leica M camera made in collaboration with Leica is produced in MOSCOW 😱
...who still makes film gear except Leica? Even including medium format?
It would surprise me too, but Cosina did make the Zeiss Ikon. Letting Cosina use the Leica name on a modified iteration of the Ikon for 3k would probably be easy money for Leica.
Let’s assume it happens. Will it affect current prices for M6/7. If the price diffrence (say, second hand M6 vs new Leica) is not that big isn’t it more sensible to buy a new film Leica rather than currenty sky high priced M6?
In what world could this ever be possible? Note they said "cheaper" not cheap.
They’re not rebadging an Ikon nor will they do anything to cut into MP sales. It has to be a CL-sized Camera with an electronic shutter or a fixed lens P&S device.
I can't see them doing a deal with Cosina or anyone else.
I think the market could work with a cheaper Leica film camera, as that market is entirely the used market now.
The question is, can they make an M body for 2500ish that Leica people would actually want? Or would it be compromised in one way or another so as not be considered a 'real' Leica or 'real' M and therefore shunned by the cognoscenti?
Leica have associated themselves with Panasonic over the years, and cell phone companies recently. A film camera made by someone else in collaboration has been done before and is surely possible now- but it won't be an M.