Frank Petronio
Well-known
http://www.lightstalkers.org/
Seems a little snooty but snooping around it was interesting... but I kind of like you guys better. Well you, not him.
Seems a little snooty but snooping around it was interesting... but I kind of like you guys better. Well you, not him.
Colin Corneau
Colin Corneau
Seems to be a decided lack of pontificating, navel-gazing "which of my 348 50mm lenses will give me the best bokeh????" type of threads by people who should just get outside more often there...I'm just sayin'.
Pablito
coco frío
LS is a community of photojournalists who discuss mostly issues related to the practice of photojournalism. Very little talk about cameras / equipment. Very interesting and useful site if you work in the field. You can find snooty people on any forum.
There is no obsessive camera or gear talk in LS. No one really cares about the difference in the out of focus rendering between one lens or another, folks are too busy taking pictures, meeting deadlines, dealing with questions of access, travel problems, copyright issues, etc.
There is no obsessive camera or gear talk in LS. No one really cares about the difference in the out of focus rendering between one lens or another, folks are too busy taking pictures, meeting deadlines, dealing with questions of access, travel problems, copyright issues, etc.
Last edited:
back alley
IMAGES
kind of like the difference between a pro and an amateur...
leicashot
Well-known
I tried joining and was rejected. Even though I have a PJ background I think my current entertainment industry status prevented me from being eligible (good enough) to join.
back alley
IMAGES
I tried joining and was rejected. Even though I have a PJ background I think my current entertainment industry status prevented me from being eligible (good enough) to join.
probably cause you hang out with us...
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
probably cause you hang out with us...
There's a few people hanging out here who are registered over there too.
leicashot
Well-known
probably cause you hang out with us...
I thought it must have been my poor work, but now that you mention it....
I just tried 'enrolling' again to see what happens
swoop
Well-known
Just tried logging in and apparently I've been a member since November 11th, 2008. Not that I've ever visited much.
Colin Corneau
Colin Corneau
leicashot, don't feel too badly. I looked over a few threads there, and noticed a name of a guy who was banned from the forums of a national photojournalists' organization here.
Abrasive loudmouthed jerk, and his work was extremely pedestrian and weak...all yap and no shoot, basically.
It's always nice getting recognition from others, of course, but don't hinge too much of your identity upon others -- sometimes things aren't always what they seem!
Abrasive loudmouthed jerk, and his work was extremely pedestrian and weak...all yap and no shoot, basically.
It's always nice getting recognition from others, of course, but don't hinge too much of your identity upon others -- sometimes things aren't always what they seem!
photogdave
Shops local
I joined LS to participate in the discussion of the titling of Michael Reichman's 'Lolita' photograph.
Apparently they were right and I was wrong.
Apparently they were right and I was wrong.
leicashot
Well-known
leicashot, don't feel too badly. I looked over a few threads there, and noticed a name of a guy who was banned from the forums of a national photojournalists' organization here.
Abrasive loudmouthed jerk, and his work was extremely pedestrian and weak...all yap and no shoot, basically.
It's always nice getting recognition from others, of course, but don't hinge too much of your identity upon others -- sometimes things aren't always what they seem!
Oh don't worry i'm not offended nor disappointed. I'm happy with this forum of great people.
Mister E
Well-known
I'm a member.
newsgrunt
Well-known
different crowd entirely. take a look at the board of novembereleven.org (organization of which lightstalkers is part of), some serious hitters there who walk the walk.
yes there can be some pettiness and there's usually very little mod interference ( if there are any mods at all) so threads can go OT quickly but that doesn't happen very much anymore, thankfully. the level of discourse can be quite engaging and well thought out which makes it a daily site for me.
where rff members tend to ask about cases and lenses, LSers will ask about on the ground working conditions etc in developing countries or they offer recommendations on fixers etc.. I'm very glad it's around and like rff, there's a definite sense of community there and that is the most important aspect of LS for me.
yes there can be some pettiness and there's usually very little mod interference ( if there are any mods at all) so threads can go OT quickly but that doesn't happen very much anymore, thankfully. the level of discourse can be quite engaging and well thought out which makes it a daily site for me.
where rff members tend to ask about cases and lenses, LSers will ask about on the ground working conditions etc in developing countries or they offer recommendations on fixers etc.. I'm very glad it's around and like rff, there's a definite sense of community there and that is the most important aspect of LS for me.
V
varjag
Guest
I'm on there too. It has been useful on several occasions.
Jamie123
Veteran
I thought it must have been my poor work, but now that you mention it....
I just tried 'enrolling' again to see what happens
Just a thought that has little to do with the topic at hand but you might want to consider getting rid of the music on your site or at least turn it off by default.
Frank Petronio
Well-known
But I thought there were almost no working photojournalists left? At least in the grand Magnum/Life tradition.
I mean I know a lot of people claim to be photojournalists but they don't make a living from the journalistic aspect of their photography...
I mean I know a lot of people claim to be photojournalists but they don't make a living from the journalistic aspect of their photography...
SamStewart
Established
Seems to be a decided lack of pontificating, navel-gazing "which of my 348 50mm lenses will give me the best bokeh????" type of threads by people who should just get outside more often there...I'm just sayin'.
and that ever happens here...
JayGannon
Well-known
I tried joining and was rejected. Even though I have a PJ background I think my current entertainment industry status prevented me from being eligible (good enough) to join.
Leicashot PM me with your portfolio what I've seen of your work your more than welcome to join.
But I thought there were almost no working photojournalists left? At least in the grand Magnum/Life tradition.
I mean I know a lot of people claim to be photojournalists but they don't make a living from the journalistic aspect of their photography...
LS is probably the last bastion of people who do fit that description.
It is an exclusive-ish community oif people who work fulltime as photographers/journalists etc, its invite only because a lot of picture desks and editors will look to LS when their regulars can't take a job, its a forum for advice on things that don't happen in the rest of the world, the gear talk is more likely to be 'what vest will protect best againt a 9mm shot' than what lens to use.
Yes there are some ego's on the site, and a lot of cynics but its a great resurce to discuss the issues that are well outside the scope of the 'real world' such as BP vests, embedding procedures, how not to get shot at Israeli checkpoints etc.
furcafe
Veteran
Did you have an invitation from an existing member? IIRC, originally anyone could join, but they later made it into an invitation-only site.
I tried joining and was rejected. Even though I have a PJ background I think my current entertainment industry status prevented me from being eligible (good enough) to join.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.