David Hughes
David Hughes
Hi,
You say you tried the ZM on a M6 but were you just playing and dry firing?
I'm asking because I think the answer is an expensive M series body, never mind which one. But very much more to the point have you put a roll of film in it and then paid for 36 decent sized prints? The minimum is 5 x 7½" but at that small size I think it pointless to buy top of the range lenses.
So we are now talking 8" x 12" to utilise the lens at a low level and that is not a budget choice. Look at prices, do some sums and you might just be better off with digital. You already have a system and, I guess, a printer and that isn't a budget choice either if you want to get the best from a modern mirror-less system...
Apologies for this being a bit of a downer but you ought to be warned and I haven't even mentioned the slippery slope you get on once you've a Leica; It's a bottomless money pit, so be warned.
Regards, David
You say you tried the ZM on a M6 but were you just playing and dry firing?
I'm asking because I think the answer is an expensive M series body, never mind which one. But very much more to the point have you put a roll of film in it and then paid for 36 decent sized prints? The minimum is 5 x 7½" but at that small size I think it pointless to buy top of the range lenses.
So we are now talking 8" x 12" to utilise the lens at a low level and that is not a budget choice. Look at prices, do some sums and you might just be better off with digital. You already have a system and, I guess, a printer and that isn't a budget choice either if you want to get the best from a modern mirror-less system...
Apologies for this being a bit of a downer but you ought to be warned and I haven't even mentioned the slippery slope you get on once you've a Leica; It's a bottomless money pit, so be warned.
Regards, David