retow
Well-known
This is what I posted yesterday:
"A few days ago I bought a Konica Hexar RF set with the M-Hexanon 50mm f2 lens.
I just did a few handheld test shots with the M8 to compare the Hexanon with my '70s Cron.
Wide open, near infinity, the Hexanon is disappointingly soft, with details and contrast suffering badly and it is absolutely no match for the seasoned Cron.
At close distances, it performs (almost) at the Cron level. Will do some more tests later today at middle distances."
Whether the rootcause is a focusing issue or whether the M8 and the Hexanon don't make a great pair, I don't know yet, but there is definitely an issue.
On the positive side, though, the Konica RF seems to work great with Leica lenses. The first roll I shot suggests no focussing issues. I did not do a systematic test, simply handheld shots with different lenses of the same subject at different apertures. In this quick comparison, film developped at cheap lab, compared low jpeg res. on screen, the Hexanon 50 seemed to be ok.
"A few days ago I bought a Konica Hexar RF set with the M-Hexanon 50mm f2 lens.
I just did a few handheld test shots with the M8 to compare the Hexanon with my '70s Cron.
Wide open, near infinity, the Hexanon is disappointingly soft, with details and contrast suffering badly and it is absolutely no match for the seasoned Cron.
At close distances, it performs (almost) at the Cron level. Will do some more tests later today at middle distances."
Whether the rootcause is a focusing issue or whether the M8 and the Hexanon don't make a great pair, I don't know yet, but there is definitely an issue.
On the positive side, though, the Konica RF seems to work great with Leica lenses. The first roll I shot suggests no focussing issues. I did not do a systematic test, simply handheld shots with different lenses of the same subject at different apertures. In this quick comparison, film developped at cheap lab, compared low jpeg res. on screen, the Hexanon 50 seemed to be ok.