LeicaTom
Watch that step!
I`ve seen so much written about this lens here in the past week in the Contax and Nikon threads.........does anyone know if there`s been any made in Leica Thread Mount, or if any newer versions have been made in the past 10 years?
I`m curious, I`d really be interested if there was a modern day version of this classic lens in LTM - maybe a special run, or if anyone out there can modify lenses to LTM?
Does anyone know?
Tom
I`m curious, I`d really be interested if there was a modern day version of this classic lens in LTM - maybe a special run, or if anyone out there can modify lenses to LTM?
Does anyone know?

Tom
Last edited:
pdx138
Established
I've heard nothing, but I'd buy one if they made it...
I have the Planar in M mount and can't really justify picking up the Sonnar too, but if it became available as a screwmount, well that I couldn't resist.
I have the Planar in M mount and can't really justify picking up the Sonnar too, but if it became available as a screwmount, well that I couldn't resist.
Last edited:
jsuominen
Well-known
LeicaTom said:I`m curious, I`d really be interested if there was a modern day version of this classic lens in LTM - maybe a special run, or if anyone out there can modify lenses to LTM?
I don't think that the kind of lens exist. But I'm quite sure that Cosina has the knowledge and tools, if they one day want to make such a lens. But is there enough customers for it? If they just make a few, the lens would cost maybe quite a lot.
LeicaTom
Watch that step!
jsuominen said:I don't think that the kind of lens exist. But I'm quite sure that Cosina has the knowledge and tools, if they one day want to make such a lens. But is there enough customers for it? If they just make a few, the lens would cost maybe quite a lot.![]()
Hmmm...well I`m sure if they would make a lot of 1,000 and NOT just for the Japanese market, they would be sold out within two or three months, even at $850 each
That would be a real killer lens that I`d sacrifice buying anything else for a while for, but I`d expect to pay that price if one came out
Tom
LeicaTom
Watch that step!
Well here`s the email I received from Zeiss a few mins ago.......
Thanks for your request and your interest in our products.
We will consider your idea, but we cannot make promises for the future
I asked them about doing a LTM version of the f1.5 Sonnar T
I think they would be fast sellers and very popular even if they cost $800+
ohh well it`s a good idea
Tom
Thanks for your request and your interest in our products.
We will consider your idea, but we cannot make promises for the future
I asked them about doing a LTM version of the f1.5 Sonnar T
I think they would be fast sellers and very popular even if they cost $800+
ohh well it`s a good idea
Tom
jsuominen
Well-known
LeicaTom said:Well here`s the email I received from Zeiss a few mins ago.......
Have you considered to ask the same question from Cosina? Maybe Tom A. could ask it from Mr. K. directly?
LeicaTom
Watch that step!
jsuominen said:Have you considered to ask the same question from Cosina? Maybe Tom A. could ask it from Mr. K. directly?![]()
Yes, whoever it takes to ask.....I just want a f1.5 50mm Sonnar in LTM!
Tom
SteveM(PA)
Poser
That would be really cool.
ferider
Veteran
Hmm.
If you are willing to spend 850 on an LTM Sonnar, add 400 US, get a used
M-mount copy, and add an M3
Your 85/2 will feel at home, too.
Roland.
If you are willing to spend 850 on an LTM Sonnar, add 400 US, get a used
M-mount copy, and add an M3
Roland.
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
with an LTM Sonnar, a 40 dollar adapter is all that is needed to mount this lens to your M mount camera.
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
You could also get the Nikon version and have someone like SK Grimes machine a Nikon-LTM adapter for you.
LeicaTom
Watch that step!
Roland,
Hmmmm well I was just offered an original Black Paint M3 over the weekend, but pretty beat for $2k
and you KNOW that I really can`t afford that at all now
I guess I`ll stick with my Canon f1.5 50mm for the "Sonnar" look now
(one of them has focusing issues)
so I guess I`m down one and the other one I have`nt used yet
Tom
Hmmmm well I was just offered an original Black Paint M3 over the weekend, but pretty beat for $2k
and you KNOW that I really can`t afford that at all now
I guess I`ll stick with my Canon f1.5 50mm for the "Sonnar" look now
(one of them has focusing issues)
so I guess I`m down one and the other one I have`nt used yet
Tom
brachal
Refrigerated User
LeicaTom said:Yes, whoever it takes to ask.....I just want a f1.5 50mm Sonnar in LTM!
Tom
Have you considered looking for a good Jupiter-3? When they're right, they're very nice indeed.
LeicaTom
Watch that step!
brachal said:Have you considered looking for a good Jupiter-3? When they're right, they're very nice indeed.
Yes, I have just need to figure out "where" I`m going to find a decent one that`s all adjusted correctly and not just a junk paperweight......
Tom
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
Come on, they're not that bad. Even if you get a bad lens and have a reputable repairman fix it for you, it will be something like $70 for the lens and $50 or so for the fxing job. Or get a known good one off an RFFer.LeicaTom said:Yes, I have just need to figure out "where" I`m going to find a decent one that`s all adjusted correctly and not just a junk paperweight......
Philipp
dexdog
Veteran
I am not sure that buying a J-3 would make sense in this case. Both the J-3 and Canon 50/1.5 are Sonnar copies. In short, the J-3 should behave pretty much like the Canon, provided you get a good example.
ferider
Veteran
Marc, one day you should compare the two !
My ZK 50/1.5 (call it either original Sonnar or J-3) behaves similar but different.
The Canon is sharper wide open but also it's bokeh is not quite as nice (some
hints at donuts). I always pick the Canon though, since it seems so much
better built than the fragile Russian lens.
The new Sonnar is an entirely different beast. Contrast is stronger,
sharper wide open without loosing OOF qualities.
Hey Marc, now that there is an alternative to the M mount, maybe there
is one on your horizon ?

Roland.
My ZK 50/1.5 (call it either original Sonnar or J-3) behaves similar but different.
The Canon is sharper wide open but also it's bokeh is not quite as nice (some
hints at donuts). I always pick the Canon though, since it seems so much
better built than the fragile Russian lens.
The new Sonnar is an entirely different beast. Contrast is stronger,
sharper wide open without loosing OOF qualities.
Hey Marc, now that there is an alternative to the M mount, maybe there
is one on your horizon ?
Roland.
LeicaTom
Watch that step!
Yeah, I guess I`ll just stick with the Canon f1.5 50mm
(I love mine, but I`be had some focusing issues with it wide open, it needs to be adjusted)
I just got another one from a job I did, so I have`nt tested it as of yet
I still think it would be great to have a modern Zeiss version of the classic lens in LTM, that`s why I started this thread in the first place, I wish the factory would consider it, perhaps they would if enough people wrote them
Tom
(I love mine, but I`be had some focusing issues with it wide open, it needs to be adjusted)
I just got another one from a job I did, so I have`nt tested it as of yet
I still think it would be great to have a modern Zeiss version of the classic lens in LTM, that`s why I started this thread in the first place, I wish the factory would consider it, perhaps they would if enough people wrote them
Tom
Last edited:
dexdog
Veteran
ferider said:Marc, one day you should compare the two !
My ZK 50/1.5 (call it either original Sonnar or J-3) behaves similar but different.
The Canon is sharper wide open but also it's bokeh is not quite as nice (some
hints at donuts). I always pick the Canon though, since it seems so much
better built than the fragile Russian lens.
The new Sonnar is an entirely different beast. Contrast is stronger,
sharper wide open without loosing OOF qualities.
Hey Marc, now that there is an alternative to the M mount, maybe there
is one on your horizon ?![]()
Roland.
I agree with your assessment of the look of the J-3 and Canon. I should have been more specific, stating that a J-3 is not comparable at all to the new Cosina-made Sonnar.
Roland, I have nothing against M-mount cameras, just leicas.
Last edited:
raid
Dad Photographer
I am content with my Brain Sweeney J-3 lens. It is sharp, and its bokeh is nice looking. It is inexpensive. It is a light lens. I have a lens hood for it.
What else could I say here?
What else could I say here?
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.