Nemo
Established
I have a question.
How can I frame with the R-D1 and a 25mm lens? I am considering that lens.
However, the R-D1 hasn't framelines for 25mm, but I suppose the whole viewfinder would be a good approximation, isn't?
Is it necessary to use an auxiliary viewfinder (35mm)?
Thanks!
How can I frame with the R-D1 and a 25mm lens? I am considering that lens.
However, the R-D1 hasn't framelines for 25mm, but I suppose the whole viewfinder would be a good approximation, isn't?
Is it necessary to use an auxiliary viewfinder (35mm)?
Thanks!
Last edited:
victoriapio
Well-known
Correction: Sorry for the brain malfunction this morning. Paul T below is right. A 25mm lens on the R-D1(s) would be the equivilent of a 37.5 mm. But you CANNOT use the 35mm frameline setting on the camera which gives a 53mm fov. See Paul T's suggestion below - using the whole rangefinder might be close to the 35mm view.
O.C.
O.C.
Last edited:
Paul T.
Veteran
Actually, the 35mm setting on the camera shows the FOV of a CROPPED 35mm lens and is therefore more like a 50mm.
Didn't try this on my R-D1, but the full frame or an external VF sounds like the best solution. THe Helios 35mm finder is still available at a bargain price I believe.
(Great photos, btw, victoriaprio)
Didn't try this on my R-D1, but the full frame or an external VF sounds like the best solution. THe Helios 35mm finder is still available at a bargain price I believe.
(Great photos, btw, victoriaprio)
Last edited:
victoriapio
Well-known
Paul T. said:Actually, the 35mm setting on the camera shows the FOV of a CROPPED 35mm lens and is therefore more like a 50mm.
Didn't try this on my R-D1, but the full frame or an external VF sounds like the best solution. THe Helios 35mm finder is still available at a bargain price I believe.
(Great photos, btw, victoriaprio)
Thanks for correcting me Paul, the mind isn't working well this morning. And thanks for the kind words about my Web site.
Getting back to the OP topic, I think Epson would have been better sticking to the FOV settings on the framelines instead of the cropped FOV settings, and letting the photograher do the interpolation. My first reaction - especially in the morning
O.C.
boilerdoc2
Well-known
Try using the full frame of the VF and see how that matches. i think it'll be really close.
Steve
Steve
uhligfd
Well-known
The RD is digital, so why not try it out at no cost and see what the camera with 25 ZM lens captures?
Photography used to be so experimental. What has happend to our collective spirit of discovery if we need to ask such questions? I wonder.
Photography used to be so experimental. What has happend to our collective spirit of discovery if we need to ask such questions? I wonder.
Nemo
Established
Just because the lens isn't at the store. They can make an order to the importer for me, but I would like to know if an external viewfinder is necessary or if, on the other hand, the whole viewfinder is enough for framing. The opinion of an actual user of the 25mm Biogon on a R-D1 would be interesting.
sebastel
coarse art umbrascriptor
as an actual user of the ZM25mm on R-D1, my comment is: no external finder necessary. but that may just be my opinion.
i have seen other people stating that they require one.
so?
buy the lens for its qualities, and decide upon an external finder later.
i have seen other people stating that they require one.
so?
buy the lens for its qualities, and decide upon an external finder later.
emraphoto
Veteran
i second the "no viewfinder needed" opinion. i have used a zm 25 on the r-d1s and the whole viewfinder seems a pretty good aproximation.
why not just use the 28mm lines out of curiosity? pretty damn close i'd guess?
why not just use the 28mm lines out of curiosity? pretty damn close i'd guess?
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.