xtoid
xtoid
Roger Hicks said:Dear Tony,
I'd agree pretty much agree, except (a) with your unnecessarily self-deprecating view of yourself and (b) with your view of Sontag. Her take on photography was that of a non-photographer with a rather shaky and highly selective technical and historical perspective. She also seemed to favor American contributions to aesthetic movements rather more than could always be justified.
As I say, I don't disagree with your overall argument; just with the view that Sontag had much idea of what she was talking about.
Cheers,
R.
Thanks for the positive feedback Roger,
Well I suppose you could say it was Sontag's historical view on photography, perhaps it should have been titled "Susan Sontag on Photography," rather than "by..." since that's the way many verbally refer to the book. I agree with your criticism that the book was limited to an American view on photography.
Have you or anyone else, any other suggestions for philosophical books on photography? If what I see in bookstores is any indication, the concern is focused on "how' rather than "why." I used to really enjoy David Vestal's articles in "Camera Darkroom."
I'm glad I took some time to get a little involved in this discussion, for instance, my views on f/64 have changed. For instance I never stopped to think of them as snobs.
Regards
_Tony
Last edited: