cjm
Well-known
I kinda like the "noise" here. I had a slow lens so it was either 3200iso or use the flash.
Post your DSLR pictures with a lot of "noise" that you think work.
Post your DSLR pictures with a lot of "noise" that you think work.
Epimetheus
Well-known
Here are couple taken with ISO 1600, although not much noise visible.
1/6", f/1.2
1/125", f/1.2
1/6", f/1.2
1/125", f/1.2
hans voralberg
Veteran
Canon 30D ISO 3200
M
M like Leica M6
Guest
My advice if you want some real evil noise:
Get a Zeiss Ikon Contarex "Bullseye", made in 1962
or
Get a Pentax 67
Press the button and say "kerfuffle ". If someone hears what you say it was the wrong button...
Get a Zeiss Ikon Contarex "Bullseye", made in 1962
or
Get a Pentax 67
Press the button and say "kerfuffle ". If someone hears what you say it was the wrong button...
pvdhaar
Peter
The only time when I have problem with noise when using high ISO (1600) on my DSLR is when I forget to take it out of evaluative metering. In situations where there's not much light, evaluative tends to expose for the highlights. The result is severe underexposure of shadow areas, and that's when noise gets ugly. But when I use ISO1600, white balance correctly and spot meter away from the highlights, the result isn't all that bad..
cmogi10
Bodhisattva
wray
Well-known
icemendicant
Established
Well, not exactly a DSLR but I think the noise here really adds to the atmosphere of the image.
This was taken with my little Pentax Optio WP digicam at high ISO with no flash, and partially desaturated in Photoshop.
This was taken with my little Pentax Optio WP digicam at high ISO with no flash, and partially desaturated in Photoshop.
hans voralberg
Veteran
LOL Wray I can hardly spot any noise in your pic
wray
Well-known
hans voralberg said:LOL Wray I can hardly spot any noise in your pic
To be fair that pic was taken in black and white mode which reduces the chroma noise. Here's a color shot. I think reducing for the web also diminishes the noise.
rogue_designer
Reciprocity Failure
It can get a bit messy.
a D100 at 6400 falls apart a bit. But they ran the image anyway. *shrug*
a D100 at 6400 falls apart a bit. But they ran the image anyway. *shrug*
wray
Well-known
rogue_designer said:It can get a bit messy.
a D100 at 6400 falls apart a bit. But they ran the image anyway. *shrug*
Nikon has come a long way since the D100. Both of mine were done with the D80. My handy dandy little D40 (bought for its small size) is even better at high iso.
rogue_designer
Reciprocity Failure
Agreed - tho it didn't help that i underexposed and had to "save" the exposures from this as much as I could in PS.
Doesn't show off the camera much if I don't do my part and get the bloody exposures right.
Doesn't show off the camera much if I don't do my part and get the bloody exposures right.
Tuolumne
Veteran
What is that a picture of? A japanese KKK rally?
/T
/T
rogue_designer
Reciprocity Failure
A spectacle theater troupe doing a lantern procession. Of course, they had the park kill all the other lights - much to the consternation of those of us covering the event.