Kodak safety film 5020

[trineonx]

Just picked up a bulk loader that already had an unknown roll in it. I shot a few frames at iso 200 and developed them. The frames came out about right at iso 200 and the edge markings on the film say odak safety film 5060. An idea what kind of film I'm using here?
Sorry, accidentally put the wrong number in the title. it is actually kodak 5060 not 5020.

 

[trineonx]

after some googling it seems that I've got some panatomic-x from the 80's. It's pretty nice looking film but a little slow for my taste.

 

[cosmonot]

I too picked up some Pan-X with bulk loaders, and it's a little slow for me as well. I'm going to try it in some Acufine and see if I can't eek out a little more speed... But I like having this stuff on hand, sharp and very fine grain in just about every developer I've tried so far. I've just been throwing it in with other emulsions if there's space in the tank as a test now and then... I really wonder what it'd be like if I started treating it "right."

 

[trineonx]

I used ilfosol S and it came out looking pretty good, thought the negatives were underexposed since I rated it at 200. 7 minutes at about 72 degrees at 1+9.

 

[Nokton48]

Panatomic-X was rated at ASA 64.

If you guys want to sell any, let me know. I'm interested.

 

[bubba got a P]

Panatomic X, Wow!

Panatomic X, Wow!

FREEZE IT! Save it! The Holy Grail of portrait film, pray over it.:angel:

Density appropriate to ASA 200 must be heat? fog.

Pan-X in Rodinal @ 68*
For scene contrast:
High: E.I 8, diluted 1:100 5.5 min.
Normal contrast: E.I.16, diluted 1:50-5 min.
Low contrast: E.I. 32, diluted 1:50-7 min.

Pan-X in undiluted D-76, Unspecified contrast: E.I. 32: 5 min. @ 68*