It's interesting the number of opinions of what films look similar. I'm going to presume that the primary characteristics that you're seeking are the toe and shoulder, since contrast is controlled entirely by exposure and development. Therefore, a lot of what people recommend will be dependent on your developer. So if you pass that along...
Perhaps you mean the grain structure, too.
I've only dev'ed it in Rodinal 1+50 and 1+100. I've found it to have a pretty long toe, without a noticeable charactistic in the shoulder. But that's only about 8-10 rolls of 120 so hard to say about that. The toe did seem quite long, though - so either I could have started exposing at like 50, or just think of it as having "rich" blacks 🙂.
At any rate, if you go for the stuff from Freestyle, Arista II Pro (?) is Agfa. Literally. Arista.edu Ultra is Foma. They were running out of the Arista II Pro, too, a while ago so it might be gone by now.
Personally, I find Efke 100 very different in the toe especially in Rodinal and ID-11 1+1. I have been meaning to try it in Perceptol 1+3 but have not done so yet.
Foma 200 is a fantastic film, but I think it has a very different look re: grain. Not like a tmax or delta film, as it's "T-200" moniker is misleading, but it doesn't look as clumpy as APX100. But it's got a good look when shot around 125-160 and dev'ed in Rodinal.