Leica LTM Leica 11d rear focusing

Leica M39 screw mount bodies/lenses

Miers

Miers
Local time
6:17 AM
Joined
Mar 23, 2007
Messages
12
Location
Melbourne
Good Day,
New chum here!I enjoy the chat on this site.
I have a question about the rear focusing hole on the 11d.I understand if a camera has this hole it is focused for one specific lens.Now... if I use a more modern lens...will it focus o.k.?
I am thinking of buying what looks like a sound camera but I was concerned about this question.
Thanks
Miers
 
If the camera body has a "0" in the 12 o'clock position on the lens bayonet, it can be used with any lens. Otherwise the lens you buy has to be matched to the body. A repairman (or woman) can do this calibration.
 
Miers,

I have one like that from 1932, and it's one of my favourite bodies. I will normally pick up the MP and the II when i go out shooting. You should get good results with any more modern lens designed for the standardised Leica mount (that's whet the ")" on the mount means). I use: Elmar , Summar, Summitar & Nikkor 50mm, CV 25 & 35mm, Jupiter 35mm, 85mm & 135mm, Canon 25mm and 50mm and all of them work just fine. Just make sure the shutter runs ok & I'm sure you will love it 😉
 
I found one on ebay asking 400€ start price black body is that not a bit expensive?

What sort of price are 11D bodies? Is it better than a 111 or 111G?

edit:I have a FED (Leica 111) and Keiv with leitz 80mm,jupiter 35mm/85mm & f2 50mm
AND Foca *,**,*** & universal with thumb wind
 
Last edited:
Splaash,

The Leica II ( referred to in some books as model D ) was introduced in 1932 as Leitz's first 35 mm camera with an integral, coupled rangefinder. It was an advancement over the Leica Standard and Model I cameras.

It was joined by the Leica III in 1933 which added "slow" shutter speeds from 1 sec to 1/20 sec via a knob on the front of the body.

Alpha suffixes identified subsequent refinements of all models of thread-mount Leica ( I, II, and III ).

The -a suffix models added a top-shutter speed of 1/1000.

The -b suffix placed the Viewfinder and Rangefinder windows right next to each other.

The -c suffix models had an all-new body made from an aluminum casting, offering greater stregnth and stability, plus improvements to the shutter mechanism.

The -f-suffix models were the first Leicas to offer integral flash synchronisation, and came in two flavors: "black-dial" and "red-dial" (referring the the flash sync).

The III-g was the last, and many believe the best, refinement of the thread-mount Leica: it featured a larger & brighter viewfinder window (but still two separate eyepieces for VF and RF), as well as bright framelines w/ parallax compensation when focusing for the 50mm and 90 mm lenses. And a built-in self-timer. And flash sync was now automatic, no more fussy sync dial and guide-book.

The III-g is pricey, with decent bodies averaging $700-$900 USD, up to $1,200-$1,500 (or more )with a lens... many argue that with even with all the improved features, it's still not as good a camera as the M-3, for nearly the same cost.

The III variants are good cameras, some late -c and early -f models tend to have issues with poor chrome and deteriorating shutter curtains, due to materials issues following WW II. If you don't have a need for the slow-speeds below 1/20 second, then you probably don't "need" a III.

The II are the basic LTM camera w/o the slow speeds. They still have "Time" and "Bulb" settings, and the -f models are flash-synched.

The black-paint versions usually bring more money, especially if the paint is in good to excellent condition...

Black-paint cameras or very early serial numbers that were sent-back to be upgraded aside, Model II generally run a little cheaper than Model III cameras, generally $50-$150 USD difference.

Black-paint and low-serial number Leicas are generally considered more desirable as collector's items than as daily users, mostly from the standpoint of wear and tear diminishing their collector value.

If a user camera is what you're after, I would suggest looking for a clean II-c or II-f, but would not suggest passing-up a III-c or III-f if it fit your budget.


Hope this helps sort it out a bit , I hope I haven't gotten my Leica history muddled !

Regards,

Luddite Frank
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom