semrich
Well-known
Forget dust spots and lack of cropping, why is the building with the banner of Ataturk looking like it is about to fall into the Bosphorus while the horizontal shoreline and the vertical ships masts are true.
This just doesn't make any sense to me, is it some mistake on my part or a problem with the camera?
This was taken with my Rolleiflex 3.5 Tessar.
Any light that can be shed on this would be appreciated.
This just doesn't make any sense to me, is it some mistake on my part or a problem with the camera?
This was taken with my Rolleiflex 3.5 Tessar.
Any light that can be shed on this would be appreciated.
Attachments
Last edited:
You didn't supply the pic, but my guess from your description is that you tilted the camera up, and this results in converging verticals. Shorelines recede too if you're at an angle to it, and so it's entirely possible to tilt the camera in such a way that the lower foreground appears level, verticals on one side of the frame appear vertical, and verticals on the other side tilt inward. Fortunately, this "perspective distortion" is a natural optical effect common to all cameras, and can be "fixed" in good software.
semrich
Well-known
Doug, sorry about that, I got a little ahead of myself. I've edited my post and attached the thumbnail for the image.
Keith
The best camera is one that still works!
FrankS
Registered User
As stated, you have converging verticals, due to pointing your camera upwards.
semrich
Well-known
Thanks everyone, I know about converging verticals, very often when I shoot wide angle with the 35's I have the CV bubble level in the hot shoe, but not hot shoe on the Rollei so this one threw me a bit because the masts were straight and the water line was level.
Thanks to Keith's tweaking I can now see that the masts needed to be converging to balance it out.
Thanks to Keith's tweaking I can now see that the masts needed to be converging to balance it out.
wclavey
Established
Yes, it is one of those situations that I find in my MF pictures as well when I switch back and forth between the TLRs and the 4x5 - - what I needed was a little front rise but the only thing I could do was tilt the lens up.
VictorM.
Well-known
ferider
Veteran
Its a little too much though, to be explained with perspective only. And the scan should be sharper.
You sure the negative looks like this on the light table ? Maybe it was curled when scanning.
Roland.
You sure the negative looks like this on the light table ? Maybe it was curled when scanning.
Roland.
charjohncarter
Veteran
Here is something that I use that helps with this problem. I have the same TLR that you have and it doesn't fit, darn.
http://www.kirkphoto.com/accessories.html#bubble
http://www.kirkphoto.com/accessories.html#bubble
raid
Dad Photographer
Its a little too much though, to be explained with perspective only. And the scan should be sharper.
You sure the negative looks like this on the light table ? Maybe it was curled when scanning.
Roland.
The 75mm taking lens is not a very wide angle lens on the Rolleiflex, so seeing such a tilt is not due to only tilting the lens upward. Something else is causing this effect.
nikon_sam
Shooter of Film...
Keith has the right fix...the shoreline should be at a slight upward angle due to camera position...if you were shooting this straight on then the shoreline would be straight across the picture...
As always, a day late and a dollar short...
As always, a day late and a dollar short...
Joe
Established
The ship is listing, as is the building. Shortly after the photo was taken, one sank, and the other was condemned.
ishpop
tall person
The ship is listing, as is the building. Shortly after the photo was taken, one sank, and the other was condemned.
lol... I agree with Raid, seems too extreme to just be shooting angle. My guess is the boat was tilted.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.