Since this is RFF an RF is implied, but you didn't say so. The only RF 6x6 I have is my Mamiya six, which I just haven't found time to fix. Of my non-RF folders, it is a toss up between my Fuji Six and my Welta 6x6. They are both good.
Where's Chippy?
hey here i am...i'm in a different time zone to you lot haha
I am guessing that the welta 6x6 you have oftherherd is the Weltax (what lens is it? also coated lens-post war or uncoated pre-war)
my favourite 6x6 folder! ( makes it easy to elimate my slr and tlr). i have real dificulty with this question and choosing which is my fav. it depends on whether i base it on usabilty, quality and features or whats conveinent for a situation (i.e if i want to just pop it in my pocket) or what has appeal to me from history point of veiw. i also tend to seperate pre war to post war when i consider a camera. from a photographic point of view i think the war really deprived us all from some would be excellent cameras that never got produced because of it (b*st&*ds!
😡 LOL). the mind boggles at what many of those german brand companies had on their drawing boards or in their minds yet to produce. leica apparently had the plans for the m3 pre-war and who knows what Ziess, Welta, Balda, Voigtlanda ect would have made. as it turned out every man and his dog was allowed access to patents,,, and copies of zeiss and others were rife, which provided the foundations for the modern cameras and companies we have now. anyway i digress...
my choice for 6x6, whilst i would like to try the last Ensign Autorange and the Fuji i'll stick to choosing from what i have..oh and the the Super Badax identicle to dazegoneby i nearly bought the other day (it went for under $200) but I didnt because it was missing the part for the auto film stop/wind. i was thinking to machine a new part for it but i would of needed at least the old part to use as a template/guide.
my post war fav (not counting any without rangefinder and with a rangefinder i prefer coupled) is my super speedex although i always seem to call it S/Isolette; probably because i have every other Iso there is bar the air operated auto exposure model. as Andrew (Texas) mentioned its only the stick on metal badge that is different although there is one other difference which is the scale is in feet and not meters. i prefer metric nowadays so sometimes i think i should sell or swap it for an Isolete but it doesnt bother me too much. being a coupled rangefinder it only comes into play if reading the DOF scale. this camera is just so easy to use with its auto film stop/counter. and is a real step up in quality compared to the isolette models below it.
having used hasselblad for years i like the EV system on the S/Isolette as well. i hardly ever use a light meter with it (although i dont often with any of my cameras if i am at an event). its coated lens is an advantage to the older cameras and that it moves all lens elements together makes better results i find.
my perkeo E (or III if you prefer) is excellent although i do admit i tend to use my perkeo II more because i tend to throw it in my pocket or have it in the console of my car i dont have to worry about puting a scratch on it.
pre-war 6x6 comes down to a choice between super Ikonta and Welta Weltur. there is no denighing the quality of the ikonta and it has double exposure prevention like many post war camera. a beautifull camera in its own right but as a negative it weighs 950grams nearly a Kilogram! (although i love its engineering) and what i count against it more compared to ..wait for it hahaha...my weltur is the front cell moves to focus.
the Weltur moves all lens elements together which gives better results and weighs 740g compared and is smaller by an inch in lenght and shorter as well. i wouldnt put it into a jeans back pocket, though it does just go, but its retro shape might catch so i dont. it does ok in coat pocket only about 15mm longer than a perkeo but most of the time a use a case out of respect lol for the ol girls. double exposure prevention is good but it doesnt take long to become acustomed to use with out it. the veiwfinder is as big and bright as the S/isolette, the build quality is comparable to the others. i dont have any trouble using the aperture and speeds as though they do have EV scales so that is easy. it doesnt have a coated lens which is about the main drawback but as all my old 1937-38-39 advertisments say for the Weltur ...
with colour corrected lens...i find that it takes marvelous b&w and colour pics..actually colour slide film often seems to have a brighter look with an uncoated lens.
having said that i do have a chrome top 6X4.5 Weltur that i have yet to restore that has a
very nice looking tessar on it with what lookes to be an early light coating or quite possibly it may be a naturaly formed coating. at some point i will give this try and if it shows some improvement over the others then i will swap it on to a Weltur 6x6 as i rarely shoot 6x4.5 (why bother compared to 6x9 lol).
so considering the Weltur was made by a couple of blokes that learnt their trade working for their unlce at Merkle (whom made excellent cameras and trained quite a few well known names that went on to make cameras and shutters we are familar with), built a company foundation during the first war (undetected by the govement lol) and the 20's, then by the 1930's really came up with some amazing inovative quality cameras. so the Weltur that was made 22 years before the S/Isolette and works close to the same standards is my overall favourite and i often pick it up to take out over any others..but hey its a tough choice