Pano slides VS digital panoramic

Local time
4:24 PM
Joined
Oct 6, 2007
Messages
41
Perhaphs it is a foolish, excuse me. I always loved the panoramic photoghaphs, landscapes are my amateur work, but since I discovered the digital panoramic programs, it is very much easy to take a panoramic photograph.
Easy, ligther and you are able to delete many mistakes.
Today scan a 6x12 slide or negative at home is very difficult and needs a expensive scanner.
At last always is the same dylemma, digital versus analogic:confused::confused:
 
I have had good results using everything from expensive Noblex MF swing lens cameras to just pivoting on foot with a digital point and shoot. PTgui works painless magic when stitching any photos, whether digital or film. The attached assortment were taken with everything from a hand held point and shoot digital to a Noblex medium format swing lens panoramic camera. Can you tell which is which?

/T
 

Attachments

  • Pano6 Large_filtered_foreground fixed.jpg
    Pano6 Large_filtered_foreground fixed.jpg
    8.9 KB · Views: 0
  • Sarita and Justing wedding stitched panoramic 3.jpg
    Sarita and Justing wedding stitched panoramic 3.jpg
    30 KB · Views: 0
  • Scan004.jpg
    Scan004.jpg
    41.5 KB · Views: 0
On a stamp-sized jpeg, it hardly matters. I did notice though that the lens on the "beachfront" shot has a pretty significant vignetting problem :D

The beach front shot was stitched with crummy Canon SW, not the magical PTgui. That might account for some of its obvious problems. It's hard to post anything large to RFF. I really hate when an upload aborts because it's too big. I usually compensate by making them too small.

/T
 
Back
Top Bottom