fidget
Lemon magnet
Looking over my scans of negatives (B&W) from a range of cameras, in particular my MF work, I came to realise that for the majority of my work I have produced images which matched the format I was using at the time.
By this I mean that when shooting with 6x6, I would generally compose square images and when shooting 4.5x6 compose to suit the whole frame. It is very rare that I produce a square format crop from a 3:4 or 2:3 neg but am happy to knock them out by the dozen from my TLR.
This needn't be a problem, but I wondered if this indicates (or even confirms) that I generally do not visualise a scene or composition and then use a camera to realise it, rather I search for a composition through whatever VF I have in use.
I find this slightly uncomfortable, is this a failing?
Dave....
By this I mean that when shooting with 6x6, I would generally compose square images and when shooting 4.5x6 compose to suit the whole frame. It is very rare that I produce a square format crop from a 3:4 or 2:3 neg but am happy to knock them out by the dozen from my TLR.
This needn't be a problem, but I wondered if this indicates (or even confirms) that I generally do not visualise a scene or composition and then use a camera to realise it, rather I search for a composition through whatever VF I have in use.
I find this slightly uncomfortable, is this a failing?
Dave....
oftheherd
Veteran
Everyone is different. I think that's OK. When I worked with a 6x6 TLR, I would take a 6x6 if it fit, just as or perhaps more often, I was looking at the retagular lines and probably trying to fit that composition as near the middle as possible so I could use more if I wanted later. Oddly, I don't find myself doing that so militantly with my 6x6 folders. Go figure.
For those not tied to 6x6 by having committed to it already, I also recommend 6x7. So much more negative.
For those not tied to 6x6 by having committed to it already, I also recommend 6x7. So much more negative.
fidget
Lemon magnet
For those not tied to 6x6 by having committed to it already, I also recommend 6x7. So much more negative.
I know what you mean by recommending 6x7. I once had GAS for a 6x7 but successfully convinced myself that it was only fractionally better than 6x6 with a thin sliver cropped off (but very much more expensive).
Dave.....
Roger Hicks
Veteran
Dear Dave,...is this a failing?
I'd regard it as more of a failing if you couldn't use the tools at hand.
Cheers,
R.
fidget
Lemon magnet
Now that I think of it, visualising an image, or even simple composition can't be a strong point of mine. When I have (thankfully) realised that I am standing in front of a scene that will make a good image, I can shot off quite a few frames, varying the standpoint.
When viewing the results, it's often a complete "no-brainer" to see which is the best composition, but on the day, I didn't recognise it.
I claim that this is part of the learning curve and that I can only improve (but still enjoying the challenge, which is very likely more important).
Dave....
When viewing the results, it's often a complete "no-brainer" to see which is the best composition, but on the day, I didn't recognise it.
I claim that this is part of the learning curve and that I can only improve (but still enjoying the challenge, which is very likely more important).
Dave....
Share: