Drambuie
Member
Over the years I've 'collected' a few Weston Master Vs, plus some more modern meters. The Westons always seemed dependable until I compared them against a brand new Sekonic and then I panicked a little. One 'newish' Weston would not adjust to the range of two others - the others did not agree with the Sekonic - the Sekonic didn't agree with a Lunasix 3S which had just been serviced by Gossen. Arghh!
But, after recording many readings with each meter and plotting them as a graph the truth dawned. Each meter had different characteristics, sensitivities and spectral responses - and the perceived differences were insignificant. Once I had noted these individual idiosyncracies, and labelled each meter with its 'tolerances', I felt quite reassured that they were all quite reliable, and (more importantly) that I really, fundamentally knew that meters are only a guide and that I really should trust my 40 years of experience more.
The moral? It ain't what you've got (or buy) that really matters, it's knowing how to use it ... My excuse for forgetting this was that I was seduced by a new piece of 'precision' gear .... I should've known better.
D'oh!
But, after recording many readings with each meter and plotting them as a graph the truth dawned. Each meter had different characteristics, sensitivities and spectral responses - and the perceived differences were insignificant. Once I had noted these individual idiosyncracies, and labelled each meter with its 'tolerances', I felt quite reassured that they were all quite reliable, and (more importantly) that I really, fundamentally knew that meters are only a guide and that I really should trust my 40 years of experience more.
The moral? It ain't what you've got (or buy) that really matters, it's knowing how to use it ... My excuse for forgetting this was that I was seduced by a new piece of 'precision' gear .... I should've known better.
D'oh!