BillBingham2
Registered User
I'm a lookin......
I'm a lookin......
I have to admit that Olympus version has be very interested. A lot depends upon the quality of the glass and approach to focusing and exposure control. I'm hoping they come out with some great primes but I'd be OK if they have a C-Mount adapter, there are some great old glass out there.
G1, not for me.
B2 (;->
I'm a lookin......
I have to admit that Olympus version has be very interested. A lot depends upon the quality of the glass and approach to focusing and exposure control. I'm hoping they come out with some great primes but I'd be OK if they have a C-Mount adapter, there are some great old glass out there.
G1, not for me.
B2 (;->
ZeissFan
Veteran
No, it's a stupid idea.
Just because you can do something doesn't mean that you should.
The 2x crop factor is a deal-breaker in a very big way.
Just because you can do something doesn't mean that you should.
The 2x crop factor is a deal-breaker in a very big way.
ZeissFan
Veteran
Furthermore, this obsessive need to put Leica lenses on every camera is simply ridiculous and borders on a sickness.
The 2x crop factor makes wide angles tough, but the kit lens is superb for 28mm. On the other hand 2x makes for some super fast short telephoto options, how about 70mm/1.2 effective using the 35/1.2 VC, or 80/1.4 with a Nokton 40. The focus is superb, no way I can focus an M this accurately, no matter how little light there is.
One other nice thing is that people don't see it, or hear it, and with the articulated LCD, shooting from the hip is actually easy.
One other nice thing is that people don't see it, or hear it, and with the articulated LCD, shooting from the hip is actually easy.
photogdave
Shops local
It's no smaller or quieter than an M body. It still has a shutter that makes a noise.One other nice thing is that people don't see it, or hear it, and with the articulated LCD, shooting from the hip is actually easy.
Agree about the LCD though. Very handy!
In my case, it's not simply because it can be done, it's because it makes perfect sense for me.
If it doesn't make sense for you, fine...but that doesn't make it a 'stupid idea' or 'a sickness' for someone else.
If it doesn't make sense for you, fine...but that doesn't make it a 'stupid idea' or 'a sickness' for someone else.
It's no smaller or quieter than an M body. It still has a shutter that makes a noise.
I said it was inconspicuous, not smaller. I don't know of any digital Ms that have a quieter shutter.
back alley
IMAGES
what's the crop factor on the m8 or rd1?
stupid or not...mine's at the post office waiting for me!!
i look forward to having a 100 mm f1.5 sonnar lens...
joe
stupid or not...mine's at the post office waiting for me!!
i look forward to having a 100 mm f1.5 sonnar lens...
joe
Fred Burton
Well-known
Looks like another round of wide open bokeh photos everywhere.
sevres_babylone
Veteran
You can never have too many.Looks like another round of wide open bokeh photos everywhere.
__________________
Joe, the crop factor on the R-D1 is 1.5. So my sonnar 1.5 is only 75mm. I envy your soon-to-be 100mm.
back alley
IMAGES
and my oh so sharp 25/2.8 will be an oh so sharp 50/2.8...
The G1 is a nice complement to both my other cameras. It offers features that neither of the others do, and it works with all my lenses (Nikon F, Nikon RF, Contax RF, M mount.)
ferider
Veteran
I'd rather use it with a 4/3rd Summilux.
But no digital for me yet ....
Roland.
But no digital for me yet ....
Roland.
Mackinaw
Think Different
Can't see myself buying a brand new micro 4/3rds camera, but, in two or three years, I may buy a used one.
Jim B.
Jim B.
back alley
IMAGES
I'd rather use it with a 4/3rd Summilux.
But no digital for me yet ....
Roland.
that's up to leica...
back alley
IMAGES
Can't see myself buying a brand new micro 4/3rds camera, but, in two or three years, I may buy a used one.
Jim B.
i got mine, nib, for a tad over 500 bucks, not too shabby...
snausages
Well-known
These will be hard to pass up once they add movie capture - who knew my M lenses would be a set of primes for video?
A couple of questions...
When we talk about 2x crop are we just essentially talking about a digitally blown up image? If you're shooting with a 50mm lens, what's the difference between the cropped digital image (100mm) captured by the G1 and just cropping a scan of a 50mm negative?
A couple of questions...
When we talk about 2x crop are we just essentially talking about a digitally blown up image? If you're shooting with a 50mm lens, what's the difference between the cropped digital image (100mm) captured by the G1 and just cropping a scan of a 50mm negative?
BillBingham2
Registered User
DGP (Damn Good Point)
DGP (Damn Good Point)
I agree, on my 4X5 a normal is a telephoto on my S3.
Having had lots of cash tied up in great glass I would have preferred to reused it, but I've found that there are LOTS of great glass out there made by lots of different people it's a great opportunity to find world class glass. The 4/3M is very interesting options especially if the provide an easy to use focus verification and a bright electronic finder.
It gives us another reason to not be done.....
B2 (;->
DGP (Damn Good Point)
what's the crop factor on the m8 or rd1?
stupid or not...mine's at the post office waiting for me!!
i look forward to having a 100 mm f1.5 sonnar lens...
joe
I agree, on my 4X5 a normal is a telephoto on my S3.
Having had lots of cash tied up in great glass I would have preferred to reused it, but I've found that there are LOTS of great glass out there made by lots of different people it's a great opportunity to find world class glass. The 4/3M is very interesting options especially if the provide an easy to use focus verification and a bright electronic finder.
It gives us another reason to not be done.....
B2 (;->
peterm1
Veteran
YES it is tough. I know because I tried it at my local camera shop. I even tried it with a M4/3-4/3 adapter with a 4/3-LeicaR adapter and a Leica R lens. I agree it's a good screen and the EVF is simply amazing - it sets a whole new standard for EVFs.
But manual focusing a lens is still slow and there is NO WAY it works better than any RF or SLR. It's more like focusing on ground glass.
Does the G1 not have focus confirmation?
My Panasonic L1 does when I use other SLR brand lenses and adapters - the lens / adapter does not have to be chipped or anything. A little "dot" lights up in the finder when it is in focus. That's it!
My Nikon D200 does much the same when I use Nikon manual focus lens.
I would have thought that this kind of focus confirmation at least is "de riguer" as would be diopter adjustment of some sort. My eyes are shot and I have to use glasses. I find it dreadfully hard to use any camera in MF mode without these two things. (Old manual cameras can be a bit different - some of those have split image viewfinders etc so I can cope with the better ones.)
Incidentally the comments here about crop factor is interesting. last xmas my wife and I went away to a beach resort for our holidays. I took my L1 and a Nikon D70s. Lots of opportunity for long shots of surf etc. One thing I had not particualarly considered was the advantage of having a 300mm lens mounted on an L1 with its 2x crop factor but it made for some wonderful shooting opportunities.
Last edited:
johnastovall
Light Hunter - RIP 2010
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.