Using Polarizers on RFs

srtiwari

srtiwari

Daktari
Local time
8:21 PM
Joined
Oct 3, 2005
Messages
1,032
Location
Vero Beach, Florida
View My Gallery
Recently bought a 39mm Linear Polarizer to use on my Leica M3, and wondered how best to assess the degree of polarisation. (I don't want the more expensive solutions at the moment.) My new Hoya 39mm came with a scale on the outer ring (-6, -4, 1 etc.) but I thought not only position of the outer ring (with scale), but also its relationship to the inner ring, was crucial. And where exactly the outer ring will sit (when screwed on) is difficult to predict.
Appreciate any help.

Subhash
 
Subhash, there's no easy solution. Polarizers cry out for SLR cameras. On rare occasions I've use a 58mm polarizer that I had, turned it until it gave the effect I wanted, and just held it against the front of the hood or lens.
 
Hi Al.
This is what is confusing to me. If the position of the outside ring (the one with the scale on it) is the ONLY concern, that is easy enough. I can just test it off the camera, and then dial in the same position of the scale on-camera and voila ! BUT, if the relative position of the 2 rings is crucial, then I'm screwed, so to speak.
Correct me, but I thought the RELATIVE position of the 2 rings was important only in Circular pols. Is this not the case ?
Any plans for Vero ?
 
Subhash, one ring screws into the lens, the other ring turns to maximize the polarizing effect. The relationship between the two rings shouldn't affect anything.

I'm still hoping to make the Vero trip in the not too distant future. The local elections are over but after those paid thug "campaign workers" for the Marcellus campaign slugged me a few times for photographing them...well, here it is nearly six weeks later and I still have pain when I turn my head too far, so I'm restricting my driving to the neighborhood. Mid September I know I'll be there because I'm shooting a wedding in Vero, and Robin told me that I'd get a ride up and back if I wasn't up to making the drive myself.
 
Al Kaplan said:
Subhash, one ring screws into the lens, the other ring turns to maximize the polarizing effect. The relationship between the two rings shouldn't affect anything.
Click to expand...

That is what I thought. Why then are there two glass surfaces. Wouldn't one be enough ?

Al Kaplan said:
I'm still hoping to make the Vero trip in the not too distant future. The local elections are over but after those paid thug "campaign workers" for the Marcellus campaign slugged me a few times for photographing them...well, here it is nearly six weeks later and I still have pain when I turn my head too far, so I'm restricting my driving to the neighborhood. Mid September I know I'll be there because I'm shooting a wedding in Vero, and Robin told me that I'd get a ride up and back if I wasn't up to making the drive myself.
Click to expand...


Too bad about the injury. Hope it gets better soon. Look forward to seeing you in sept.
 
Buy a bigger polarizer, e.g. 77mm, and then put it on the lens with a vented step up ring. You can then see the polarization effect in the corner of the VF.

Beats transferring numbers on two filters.
 
I've been using a Hoya 39mm polarizer occasionally with my screw-mount Leicas...

I've been shooting older lenses (36mm slip-on filter mount), and using the Leitz A-36 > E-39 filter adapter... this allows me to screw the filter into the adapter, then slip the whole rig on & off the lens for dialing-in the polarization, then getting it back on the lens w/o rotating anything.

It's more difficult when using my E-39 Summicron, as I have to screw the polarizer right into the lens.

The relationship between the two glasses of the polarizer is critical; this is how polarization is achieved... at least that's what I'm given to understand from reading the older(pre-1980) texts on photography.


The suggestion of using the 77mm (?) filter & vented hood sounds about the most convenient solution in terms of convenience during shooting...

Can't cite any personal experience regarding linear vs circular polarizer; I was under the impression that one type is better-suited to digital cameras...

Luddite Frank
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom