Most that you ever spent on One camera Body?

Most that you ever spent on One camera Body?

  • >$10,000

    Votes: 4 1.8%

  • >$5,000

    Votes: 25 11.5%

  • >$2,000

    Votes: 83 38.1%

  • >$1,000

    Votes: 65 29.8%

  • >$500

    Votes: 28 12.8%

  • >$100

    Votes: 10 4.6%

  • >$10

    Votes: 1 0.5%

  • Only use the ones people give to me for free.

    Votes: 2 0.9%
  • Total voters
    218
  • Poll closed .
Sonnar Brian

Sonnar Brian

Product of the Fifties
Staff member
Local time
1:32 PM
Joined
Jan 12, 2004
Messages
19,609
What is the most money that you ever spent on One camera body, Either for Professional use or for Personal use?

Me:
Professional use: Kodak DCS200ir, $12,400. 1.6MPixel DSLR, Circa 1992. Explains why I was so excited that the D1x's were only $6,500 each for a 5.74MPixel camera.

Home Use: $1,900ea. Pair of Nikon SP's, Titanium Curtains, Mint-. Nikon S3 Millenium with lens, $2,400.

Hmmm.. That first one adds up to two M9's considering I bought a Spare $1,500 SCSI 80MByte drive for it.

And The Three SP's that I have add up to about one M9.
 
Last edited:
$1200 U.S. for my Nikon F100 with MB15 grip. Bought in 1998 for professional use.
$800 CDN for my Leica M6 in 2007 for personal use.
 
$60 - Canon FTb + 50mm 1.8
>$50 - Kiev 4 + J-8

and I was thinking of making a bid on an M3 DS... but even 350 is alot if I can't see the corners. maybe I'll do it anyways...

cheers!
 
When i was in high school my dad bought me a Nikon F4s, which cost $1800 for the body. I carried it everywhere back then cause it was cool to have the top pro camera at age 18, but now i never use it. Too bulky and WAY too heavy! I don't like how Nikon's lenses render either so i am mostly using Olympus OM for 35mm work.
 
Professional: Early pro digital was expensive - early pro digital video was EXPENSIVE. Even rental would usually shoot past the $10,000 mark on large projects.
 
sevo said:
Professional: Early pro digital was expensive - early pro digital video was EXPENSIVE. Even rental would usually shoot past the $10,000 mark on large projects.
Click to expand...

I bought a Panasonic TQ2026 Video Disk Recorder for >$20,000 in ~1988. I used to do stop-frame computer-generated animation. I had the Video cards custom made for the computer.

Anybody need some Panasonic Laserdisks? They were $100 each, could not bring myself to toss them. Maybe they will make pretty clock faces.
 
Last edited:
I really can not answer that for fear that my wife might somehow get on this forum and read this post. You there hon', love ya.
 
Alpa 9d for my 13th birthday (still have it), no idea what it cost. Bummed my Dad's lenses through high school and then bought a Nikon in college. My Dad never understood why... I told him that if Nikon was good enough for National Geographic then it was certainly good enough for my crappy pictures :D
 
Oops, I said >2000, but I meant >1000. (I always get greater than and less than confused. And I'm a teacher!!! :eek: )

I paid $1595 for my D100 in 2002. I still use that camera as my main digital camera, but also use a D70 that has in internal IR filter, and a Coolpix 950 as it attaches to a number of instruments I use.

None of my film cameras cost anywhere near that much.
 
...and for the past several years about the only 35mm camera I use is that cheap viewfinderless, rangefinderless, Bessa L, the one Cameraquest was selling for $59.95 "with a lens purchase".
 
I bought my Leica for $500 and it apparently had a fresh CLA days earlier and hadnt been marked up , little bit of a beater on the looks end of things , feels brand new otherwise.
Technically, I only cashed out about $200 on it but i traded $300 worth of stuff to get it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom