eleskin
Well-known
There are many online who say a lot of people buy a Noctilux and only keep it for a short time, only to sell it. My thoughts are why have others kept their Noctilux. When I bought mine, I knew very well what I was getting into, and appreciate what the limits are in f1.0 photography. If used sensibly, this optic can render a unique image like no other lens for a certain specific "look" and can prove to be a keeper that one would never sell. I am one of those who will never sell.
This is open to ALL M users , Digital and Film. Why have you NOT sold your Noctilux?
This is open to ALL M users , Digital and Film. Why have you NOT sold your Noctilux?
maddoc
... likes film again.
I own my Noctilux since January 2007, had it repaired and calibrated once by Leica. The lens is heavy and not easy to focus, actually it takes a lot of practice .... Also f/1.0 and the resulting shallow depth of field limits the range of subjects. But if everything fits ... then the lens can render some very nice results. 
axiom
Non-Registered User
I need the speed.
I really do
I really do
Rayt
Nonplayer Character
I have an M3 DS dedicated to one. For every Leica lens there are cheaper and as capable lenses in other brands but not the Noctilux; there is no substitute.
rodinal
film user
Take a Noctilux + M7 + Neopan 1600 and you will be able to photograph anything you can see at night, handheld. No other camera/lens combination compares to this one. I love available darkness photography. I've owned my Nocti for three years now and even got a spare after the first year (irresistible price and fear to lose an extinguishing lens).
fleetwoodjazz
Established
If taking handheld photo at night, I would say now the two Nokton are really "doing it" at much as the Noctilux. This is the case with you, any plan to part with your spare one
matt335
Well-known
I haven't had mine long. It allows you to push your creative desires to another level. It is heavy, hard to use, takes a while to get accustomed but it is like no other lens I have used ever. Why would I want to sell it? No idea really. Some photog's use certain gear to improve their photography, whereas some see before they shoot with any camera. Don't buy one to improve your work, and don't sell one because it didn't improve your work. It performs beautifully from f2 to f16. When you go further past f2 to f1 it takes you into another level altogether. It allows you to create and improvise on film without after effects.
Mountainsmith
Member
Simple.... it's unique. Many of us know why it's so unique. For those who don't know, have a look on the photos, and you tell me....
furcafe
Veteran
Ditto. I simply do a lot of low-light photography & having f/1 increases the # of keepers. It's mostly an available darkness tool. I don't use it as a "special effects" lens for the shallow DoF (e.g., no daylight shooting w/ND filters); not that there's anything wrong w/that if that's what floats your boat, but that's not why I have a Noctilux.
Although I can certainly (& have) used it as a regular 50mm, I think the Noctilux is a specialty lens, like a fast telephoto, superwide, or macro. If you need it enough to be worth the extra money, you keep it. Per fleetwoodjazz's post, if the f/1.1 Nokton had been available back in 2002 (or the 50/1.2 M-Hexanon had been more available), I might have bought it instead; if I was rich right now, I might replace it w/the new version!
Although I can certainly (& have) used it as a regular 50mm, I think the Noctilux is a specialty lens, like a fast telephoto, superwide, or macro. If you need it enough to be worth the extra money, you keep it. Per fleetwoodjazz's post, if the f/1.1 Nokton had been available back in 2002 (or the 50/1.2 M-Hexanon had been more available), I might have bought it instead; if I was rich right now, I might replace it w/the new version!
Last edited:
Ken Shipman
Well-known
Difficult to handle, but it's irresistible for me. My avatar was taken with a Noctilux.
jarski
Veteran
I've hoarded quite a few M (incl. used Noctilux from -80's) & LTM lenses that havent been used very much, yet. why not used, I dont have digital body behind the lens, yet.
so, havent sold because my initial purpose of buying those lenses hasnt realized, yet
so, havent sold because my initial purpose of buying those lenses hasnt realized, yet
johnastovall
Light Hunter - RIP 2010
martin s
Well-known
peter_n
Veteran
+1. For the look of it at f1 or thereabouts, so I'm keeping it. The new one looks like a faster 50/1.4 ASPH to me.
Benjamin Marks
Veteran
I like mine because it does things that no other lens does and has a look all its own. From a practical perspective, if I sold it, I'd never be able to afford to replace it either.
Ben Marks
Ben Marks