Cron
Well-known
Definitely lens porn ;-)
I managed to bring the two tele-lenses, Zenzanon 4,5/100 and 4,5/135, for the MF Bronica RF645 together. Size comparison. Very similar size at infinity, when focused to nearest distance the 135 is much longer.
If interested, please take a look into my FlickR.
As I know some of you are not interested in hardware photos there are also few pictures made with the 135 in my Bronica album. No direct comparison pics between the two lenses made.
Regards
I managed to bring the two tele-lenses, Zenzanon 4,5/100 and 4,5/135, for the MF Bronica RF645 together. Size comparison. Very similar size at infinity, when focused to nearest distance the 135 is much longer.
If interested, please take a look into my FlickR.
As I know some of you are not interested in hardware photos there are also few pictures made with the 135 in my Bronica album. No direct comparison pics between the two lenses made.
Regards
Debusti Paolo
Well-known
And the winner is??????????????
Turtle
Veteran
At 100mm, the 100mm is better. If you need a 135 the 135 is better.
Matus
Well-known
what about some sample shots, comaprison, crops ... whatever 
a shot of the camera with the lens(es) mounted would be great too
a shot of the camera with the lens(es) mounted would be great too
Cron
Well-known
sorry, no direct comparison
Debusti Paolo
Well-known
Which one is the lense YOU LIKE the most?Why?
Cron
Well-known
I prefer 4,5/135 because of being more a tele
Matus
Well-known
I seem to remember that the 100 focuses down to 1.2m and the 135 to 1.8. That should in theory allow a bit (truly a bit only - should be a difference cca 10%) tighter composition - could you comment how these two lenses compare in real life in the close focusing/portraits photograhy?