Can you persuade me to buy a Jupiter-12?

p.giannakis

Pan Giannakis
Local time
9:59 AM
Joined
Jul 8, 2008
Messages
5,982
I am looking for a 35mm LTM for my IIc. Is Jupiter-12 the way to go? Can you post some pictures taken with your J-12?
 
My advice would be - DON'T DO IT!! - yes there are those here that think it's wonderful (not many!) I've had two or three over the years, and all were disappointing, and no there was nothing wrong with their adjustment or condition!. It is a seventy plus year old design and can not be expected to perform like a more modern lens, you would do yourself a favour - in the long run, by saving for something decent :)
Dave.
 
I thought about getting one a couple of times, then sanity checked in.

First, you don't know what you're gonna get because they're old or Russian, or both.

Second, the rear sticks out and can cause shutter problems with some cameras.

Unless you can get a reputable one or one for real cheap, you should save the $$ for something else as others have suggested.

j
 
No.

Go with a Canon 35
....well, I have a f3.5 'Serenar' that has similar capabilities to the J12 - although slightly better!, the later Canons were a lot better. The last J12 - I bought here from the late Pitxu for £12, in lovely condition, and a great implement.....for throwing at cats in my back yard on a night!
Dave.
 
Buy one cheap as a fun lens if you feel the need, but there are better 35mm screw-mount lenses out there for reasonable money (the Voigtlander 35mm f/2.5 springs to mind).
 
It's actually a pretty decent lens once you get the hang of it:








If you can get one cheaply, it can be a good entry lens into wideangles. Works on the Bessa R, too, with a little care. I ended up using the Skopar 35/2.5 Skopar more, but for the $30 or so I paid for the J-12 it has given me a lot of happiness and good images.
 
Pitxu passed away a few months ago, quit RFF before that.

J-12's are cheap enough to buy one and find out for yourself. Mine was $20.
 
Mine arrived between soft focus and no focus. Sent it to Russia for tweaking, it came back between soft focus and no focus.
 
I thought about getting one a couple of times, then sanity checked in.

Sanity or Insanity???

First, you don't know what you're gonna get because they're old or Russian, or both.

I've got two and both are excellent lens.. The J-12 is a pre war Zeiss Biogon that has the advantage of lens coating. Russian lens can be fine lens.

Second, the rear sticks out and can cause shutter problems with some cameras.

Not true. They do not however work with those cameras that have flip out meters such as the CL and M5. On the Canon RF's such as the P and 7 series some examples of the J-12 have a slightly larger diameter rear element which will make contact with the top and bottom baffles but in no case whatsoever will the rear element make contact with the curtains..

Unless you can get a reputable one or one for real cheap, you should save the $$ for something else as others have suggested.

j

Contrary to popular belief the J-12 is a fine lens capable of excellent results and while I have other 35's (Canon and Summaron) the J-12 is still one of my favorites..
 
Pitxu passed away a few months ago, quit RFF before that.

Didn't know that (knew the latter but not the former). Guess I didn't frequent RFF for a while. Sorry to hear, I liked the chap.

I still got a piece of the chunk of Basque cheese he sent me. Will share that later in memory of the man.
 
Does the J-12 work with the Leica CL ? thanks in adcance.

Not by default. You have to use an M-LTM adapter ring anyway; you can file down one of the lugs of the adapter slightly so that it doesn't bring up the metering arm. After that the J-12 will work (I use it like that on the M5). You won't have exposure metering of course.
 
Sanity or Insanity???



I've got two and both are excellent lens.. The J-12 is a pre war Zeiss Biogon that has the advantage of lens coating. Russian lens can be fine lens.



Not true. They do not however work with those cameras that have flip out meters such as the CL and M5. On the Canon RF's such as the P and 7 series some examples of the J-12 have a slightly larger diameter rear element which will make contact with the top and bottom baffles but in no case whatsoever will the rear element make contact with the curtains..



Contrary to popular belief the J-12 is a fine lens capable of excellent results and while I have other 35's (Canon and Summaron) the J-12 is still one of my favorites..


I'm not saying that they're not good. My experience with obtaining Jupiter 8s was that I had to return a couple but the one I kept was nice. It's really luck sometimes, and I guess I wasn't lucky and had to deal with the hassle of shipping them back. And I really wanted an J12, but in the end I didn't think it was worth rolling the dice like I did for the J8s. If you can try one in person, and get one for a good price, then by all means....
 
Last edited:
Here are two more. Jup-12 on Leica IIIa. I'd say good value for money before I can invest in a CV 35mm f:2,5.

Peintre-4.jpg

Peintre-5.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom