Sparrow
Veteran
HCB just turned over in his grave.
that would be to fix the decomposition ... sorry I'll get my coat
HCB just turned over in his grave.
Why? What makes it better?
Why do you think the GF-1 is better than the D5000? Is it just the ergonomics? The GF-1 certainly is smaller. But no viewfinder.
Most importantly to me is the camera's capability of capturing the full range of light that I come across in street photography. According to the dxomark data, the GF-1 is much less capable of capturing highlights and shadows at the same time. By their measure, the D5000 sensor can capture a dynamic range of 12.5, the GF-1 DR is 10.3. If I remember correctly, typical color film's dynamic range is something like 13.
Nick,
Thanks for the analysis. I'm in, soon as I sell off some of the film gear. I was thinking of going with the D300, due to its ability to meter with the older manual Nikkors. But I think the flip-down screen is by far a more useful tool for me... the shy street photographer.
Jamie
It's spelt quiet not quite, I know that even English is only my second language.....
Now, which lens is shape fo the Nikon D5000 SL fo steet photogaphy?
A phrase I've loved ever since I heard it is 'hardening of the categories'.
Cheers,
R.
Gordon is the one that get's it! but I understand you starting a thread wishing to justify the D5000 as a good street camera. To me street photography & B&W go hand n hand & as far as comparing B&W images from a digital camera I seriously doubt the D5000 can even or top the RD-1.Any camera works as a street camera. Even an 8x10 view camera. Atget is still considered one of the great street photographers and he even used glass plates.