gdi
Veteran
And many would. Epson, despite being a manufacturer with little-to-no experience with rangefinders, made a camera that managed to endear itself to its owners for its utility and for its ergonomics that - here's the surprising part - are in some ways MUCH better than Leica, with all its decades of experience, has made to date. That's why so many of us who either own or have owned the camera are so fond of it. Even if its sensor is dated; even if we wish the camera had readier access to service, we still can't help but like the thing.
Personally, I feel the same about the R-D1 as I do the film M bodies. It's just right in so many ways that I was willing to work with its limitations.
Well Cosina probably manufactured most of it and had a bit of experience in building Rf cameras. Being based on the R2 - it has very similar ergonomics - not a bad thing, especially if you are charmed by the throwback style. That's why I personally don't find it that surprising - if Epson had designed and tooled up from scratch to build the body and sensor then I'm sure I'd feel different.
I love the R-D1 and it has a great look to the images as these shots show. And there are some features that are better than the Leica digitals. I really like the slide film look of shots out of the camera and the B&W has a great noise character. Also, I find that I get better Infrared out the R-D1 than the M8, the M8 may be more IR sensitive, but the R-D1 can be shot at 1600 and the shots look as close as I have seen to HIE( for digital).
Interesting that you sold yours when you like it so much, what ws your motivation? I understand from some of your posts that your profession is wedding photographer. Did you ever use your R-D1 for your work?