antiquark
Derek Ross
With stock photography, it's 100% necessary to get model releases. That's because the pictures can end up anywhere... literally!
Your picture of grandpa with a big smile on his face could end up on a Viagra billboard in Times square! No joke!
Your picture of grandpa with a big smile on his face could end up on a Viagra billboard in Times square! No joke!
Mcary
Well-known
Most stock agencies require you to submit the release(s) for review at the same time as you submit the images. Its also a good idea to use one of the released from one of the larger sites like Shutterstock just remove the any wording related to that site and you should have a good generic release.
coelacanth
Ride, dive, shoot.
Found this: http://www.istockphoto.com/license.php
Many stock photo sites let you choose what use/industry/nature your photo can be used (e.g. No porn, no illegal drug ad) but you'll just never know. I assume that's a big part of the reasons why you can't find many kids/family type of photos.
Ask your designer/marketing friends what type of photo they have hard time finding.
Many stock photo sites let you choose what use/industry/nature your photo can be used (e.g. No porn, no illegal drug ad) but you'll just never know. I assume that's a big part of the reasons why you can't find many kids/family type of photos.
Ask your designer/marketing friends what type of photo they have hard time finding.
LeicaFoReVer
Addicted to Rangefinders
Mcary
Well-known
It really depends on the usage of the image(s) For images that will be used for commercial purposes a model release is required for each recongizable person in a picture. One the other hand images can be used for editorial purpose without having a release, but the market is tilted to 99% commercial 1% editorial.
coelacanth
Ride, dive, shoot.
I'm speaking from customer's point of view.
Photos I need (hard to find)
• Natural kids/family shots (reasons listed above)
• Shots with white/black background (quicker to use in presentations)
• Animals
• In-motion shots without photoshop job (real motion blur, etc)
• Anything that I have better control in short time
Photos I don't need (too many out there)
• Hard to manipulate shots (see above)
• Composed photo like dollar sign, 1&0 all over
• Meeting shots, anything office related, two people handshaking
• Blondie with inter-com and smile.
• Fake motion blur or pretty much any photoshop effects you can think of
Photos I need (hard to find)
• Natural kids/family shots (reasons listed above)
• Shots with white/black background (quicker to use in presentations)
• Animals
• In-motion shots without photoshop job (real motion blur, etc)
• Anything that I have better control in short time
- No cropped elements
- Background easier to manipulate
- Good exposure with no clipping, etc
- Background easier to manipulate
- Good exposure with no clipping, etc
Photos I don't need (too many out there)
• Hard to manipulate shots (see above)
• Composed photo like dollar sign, 1&0 all over
• Meeting shots, anything office related, two people handshaking
• Blondie with inter-com and smile.
• Fake motion blur or pretty much any photoshop effects you can think of
Last edited:
LeicaFoReVer
Addicted to Rangefinders
Thanks for referencing me
"Hard to manipulate shots (see above)". If I am a photoshop geek, I would be easily manipulate above photos. Actually I did some for the jellyfish photo. I erased some reflections on the glass. It was pretty easy even if I am not familiar with photoshop...
Though they say they dont need animal photos anymore and they need more corporate photos.
Just have a look at people's photos and tell me what percentage of them fit the above description. That is the ideal case you are giving.
Last edited:
coelacanth
Ride, dive, shoot.
"they need more corporate photos."
LOL.
I specialize in fixing super cheesy marketing materials, presentations, UI, web presence, etc and I have more than enough clients to help out. That means the market is filled with people looking for more typical corporate shots and handshaking interracial man and woman in bright futuristic office.
I certainly don't need smiling customer service rep shots any more than we have right now.
LOL.
I specialize in fixing super cheesy marketing materials, presentations, UI, web presence, etc and I have more than enough clients to help out. That means the market is filled with people looking for more typical corporate shots and handshaking interracial man and woman in bright futuristic office.
I certainly don't need smiling customer service rep shots any more than we have right now.
LeicaFoReVer
Addicted to Rangefinders
Images that iStock does need:
Corporate shots
Everyone looks a little more handsome when a suit's involved.
Groups & Teams
One person is great, two, three, four… just gets better and better.
Concept Stock
Leave it to others to shoot the obvious.
Sports
Cycling, ping pong, soccer, skateboarding, kung-fu, bocci ball, the list goes on.
Rare Artifacts
The more rare, the better.
Illustrations
Vector and not rasterized.
Holiday & Seasonal Themes
Christmas, Valentines, Easter: don’t wait until the last minute.
Fashion
Leave the jeans behind, unless they're couture...
Analogue and Grunge
Intriguing textures, effects, & treatments – not for the amateur of style.
Food and Beverages
Preferably with someone holding the edible item.
Images that iStock does not need:
Your dog or cat
He's adorable. Send a picture to your mom.
Flowers
iStock now possesses the definitive online collection of files called ‘flower’.
Flags
We can now proudly say we have every country covered.
Photos of your feet, socks, etc.
Try looking up with your camera instead.
Your immediate environment
Get up, move around a little. Keyboards, mice, cables, compact discs, floppy discs and monitors are covered.
Light Blurs
Great for fun and experimenting...
Brick walls
The Wall came down in 1989. Get over it.
Close-ups of fire
It's for your own safety.
Close-ups of eyes
They scare small children.
Symbols (!$%@)
You see it in every e-mail.
Sunsets & clouds
Very pretty, but...
Forest Snap Shots
We love nature, but...
Airplane Wings (& out the window shots)
In the end, they seem to all look the same.
Your Shadow
Try another route of dodging the model release.
Overly simple 3-D & Bryce renderings & Photoshop backgrounds
Challenge yourself a little.
Photoshop Backgrounds
Fun to experiment, but they're not quite stock.
Overly simple text
Let people pick out their own fonts.
Everyone looks a little more handsome when a suit's involved.
One person is great, two, three, four… just gets better and better.
Leave it to others to shoot the obvious.
Cycling, ping pong, soccer, skateboarding, kung-fu, bocci ball, the list goes on.
The more rare, the better.
Vector and not rasterized.
Christmas, Valentines, Easter: don’t wait until the last minute.
Fashion
Leave the jeans behind, unless they're couture...
Analogue and Grunge
Intriguing textures, effects, & treatments – not for the amateur of style.
Food and Beverages
Preferably with someone holding the edible item.
Images that iStock does not need:
Your dog or cat
He's adorable. Send a picture to your mom.
Flowers
iStock now possesses the definitive online collection of files called ‘flower’.
Flags
We can now proudly say we have every country covered.
Photos of your feet, socks, etc.
Try looking up with your camera instead.
Get up, move around a little. Keyboards, mice, cables, compact discs, floppy discs and monitors are covered.
Light Blurs
Great for fun and experimenting...
Brick walls
The Wall came down in 1989. Get over it.
Close-ups of fire
It's for your own safety.
Close-ups of eyes
They scare small children.
Symbols (!$%@)
You see it in every e-mail.
Sunsets & clouds
Very pretty, but...
Forest Snap Shots
We love nature, but...
Airplane Wings (& out the window shots)
In the end, they seem to all look the same.
Your Shadow
Try another route of dodging the model release.
Overly simple 3-D & Bryce renderings & Photoshop backgrounds
Challenge yourself a little.
Photoshop Backgrounds
Fun to experiment, but they're not quite stock.
Overly simple text
Let people pick out their own fonts.
coelacanth
Ride, dive, shoot.
the questions is,
Do you want to shoot those you listed they need?
Do you want to shoot those you listed they need?
LeicaFoReVer
Addicted to Rangefinders
probably no
It is too much restricted...I should be able to put descent shots and sell to someone likes...few or many, does not matter..So that is why I better continue my zenfolio...
It is too much restricted...I should be able to put descent shots and sell to someone likes...few or many, does not matter..So that is why I better continue my zenfolio...
coelacanth
Ride, dive, shoot.
And I love your photos on zenfolio a lot more than any stockphotos. Don't give in to the darkside, and enjoy what you love, right?
Don't give in to the darkside, and enjoy what you love, right?
LeicaFoReVer
Addicted to Rangefinders
And I love your photos on zenfolio a lot more than any stockphotos.
Ok thanks a lot!! I am glad that you liked my zenfolio!
kbg32
neo-romanticist
One does not "sell" to stock agencies. If you do, you've picked the wrong one. Stock agencies basically license imagery for a certain usage for a particular amount of time. That is how they get paid. Of which you earn and get paid a percentage, a royalty, of that sale.
Pico
-
They are a slick photo agency. It helps to get a feel for their needs. As a former picture editor, I can tell you that there are only a few standard rejection comments to make.
They are probably overwhelmed with submissions and have a push-button batching process for rejections. I would. After a while particular photographers would be rejected without even looking at the work.
They are probably overwhelmed with submissions and have a push-button batching process for rejections. I would. After a while particular photographers would be rejected without even looking at the work.
shadowfox
Darkroom printing lives
probably no
It is too much restricted...I should be able to put descent shots and sell to someone likes...few or many, does not matter..So that is why I better continue my zenfolio...
Aykut (btw, your name is very intriguing, I'd love to know its origin and meaning),
Truthfully, your images are too artistic and personal to be a stock-image.
Just in case it's not clear, I *like* your photographs
I played that game of pleasing-the-reviewers a few years back, and I got accepted (istockphoto, and another one whose name escapes me now), but I hated the whole experience.
I don't want to spend a lot of time getting an image just so I can measure up (or down) to the reviewer's "standard." I stopped the whole thing and never looked back.
Keep shooting the way you enjoy, make an honest effort to create a good photobook (now, that's an exercise of editing that will make your head hurts).
And don't expect miracles
LeicaFoReVer
Addicted to Rangefinders
Hi Will,
Thanks for your time to review my photos and I am glad you like them. My name is Turkish by the way
Thanks for your time to review my photos and I am glad you like them. My name is Turkish by the way
coelacanth
Ride, dive, shoot.
How do you pronounce your name? (If you don't mind me asking)
I have a coworker from Turkey. His name is written Cuneyt but pronounced "june-eight" according to him.
I have a coworker from Turkey. His name is written Cuneyt but pronounced "june-eight" according to him.
LeicaFoReVer
Addicted to Rangefinders
more or less sounds like "I could" without the L pronounced
June-eight is not a bad method. only thing is "u" must be turkish "u" with dots, which is pronounced like in "jude"
June-eight is not a bad method. only thing is "u" must be turkish "u" with dots, which is pronounced like in "jude"
photocodo
Newbie
my spin on stock
my spin on stock
I recently started putting my work on istockphoto. I have found it to be very discouraging and they are very picky in their selection of photos. That being said, I have a friend who is making $2000/month on istock. I was shocked when he told me that because my success has been minimal. His suggestions are that your images HAVE to be simple, not over processed, not too much clutter... just simple. Conceptual images are the only ones that sell on there.
The image is only half the battle, if people cant find your image, then they wont buy your image. You have to be proficient at key wording. Here are the tips he gave me.
1. The first 10 keywords should be conceptual, if possible (eg. teamwork, stewardship, compassion etc) then use words to describe your image (eg. man, sky, hand, dog, etc). The search engine searches from the beginning of your keywords first and most people are looking for those conceptual images.
2. You dont need 50 keywords because the search engine searches from the front of your list to the back, the last 30 words will never even make it to the search engine. So keep your keywording simple but very accurate.
3. Dont use multiple versions or words (eg. hand and hands), the search engine will automate these variations for you.
I have seen many people who only have 800 or 1000 images be more successful than those with thousands of images, simply because they know how to keyword to get their images to the front of the results page.
When it comes to actually shooting the images, again keep it simple. Ive read a couple people on this post say that stock sites like free space, which I absolutely agree with. So give them free space. My friend sets a goal for himself to shoot and upload 5 great images per week that are keyworded well. It does seem like a lot of work but I have found that with keywording, the more you do it, the easier it becomes. When you search the istock site, look at the first few images that come up and see how they keyword, thats a good indication of how you should do it too.
If you want to make $10,000/month doing stock, then it will be a full time job, but with a little practice and patients you can generate a handsome supplemental income for yourself in no time.
When I go out to shoot for personal assignments, I try to capture at least 1 or 2 images just for stock. I try to browse the istock website every now and then just to see what people are buying and selling. Conceptual images really do sell on these sites. My advice is to stick with it and try it for a year, if your not happy with the results then you can walk away from it.
It is difficult to get the hang of the process (I am still just a beginner) but once you understand what they want and how to effectively get the image to the front of the search pages, I think you will be happy with your results.
Dont let anyone tell you that your not a "real" photographer if you shoot stock, and dont fall under the impression that if you shoot stock you can't shoot anything that you want. What is great about stock, especially if it is not your only income, is that it is supplemental, which makes it a hobby. Plus it is a great feeling to be flipping through a magazine or walking down the street and unexpectedly see your image.
Keep it up and I would love to talk with people about stock so send me a message or something
Photocodo
my spin on stock
I recently started putting my work on istockphoto. I have found it to be very discouraging and they are very picky in their selection of photos. That being said, I have a friend who is making $2000/month on istock. I was shocked when he told me that because my success has been minimal. His suggestions are that your images HAVE to be simple, not over processed, not too much clutter... just simple. Conceptual images are the only ones that sell on there.
The image is only half the battle, if people cant find your image, then they wont buy your image. You have to be proficient at key wording. Here are the tips he gave me.
1. The first 10 keywords should be conceptual, if possible (eg. teamwork, stewardship, compassion etc) then use words to describe your image (eg. man, sky, hand, dog, etc). The search engine searches from the beginning of your keywords first and most people are looking for those conceptual images.
2. You dont need 50 keywords because the search engine searches from the front of your list to the back, the last 30 words will never even make it to the search engine. So keep your keywording simple but very accurate.
3. Dont use multiple versions or words (eg. hand and hands), the search engine will automate these variations for you.
I have seen many people who only have 800 or 1000 images be more successful than those with thousands of images, simply because they know how to keyword to get their images to the front of the results page.
When it comes to actually shooting the images, again keep it simple. Ive read a couple people on this post say that stock sites like free space, which I absolutely agree with. So give them free space. My friend sets a goal for himself to shoot and upload 5 great images per week that are keyworded well. It does seem like a lot of work but I have found that with keywording, the more you do it, the easier it becomes. When you search the istock site, look at the first few images that come up and see how they keyword, thats a good indication of how you should do it too.
If you want to make $10,000/month doing stock, then it will be a full time job, but with a little practice and patients you can generate a handsome supplemental income for yourself in no time.
When I go out to shoot for personal assignments, I try to capture at least 1 or 2 images just for stock. I try to browse the istock website every now and then just to see what people are buying and selling. Conceptual images really do sell on these sites. My advice is to stick with it and try it for a year, if your not happy with the results then you can walk away from it.
It is difficult to get the hang of the process (I am still just a beginner) but once you understand what they want and how to effectively get the image to the front of the search pages, I think you will be happy with your results.
Dont let anyone tell you that your not a "real" photographer if you shoot stock, and dont fall under the impression that if you shoot stock you can't shoot anything that you want. What is great about stock, especially if it is not your only income, is that it is supplemental, which makes it a hobby. Plus it is a great feeling to be flipping through a magazine or walking down the street and unexpectedly see your image.
Keep it up and I would love to talk with people about stock so send me a message or something
Photocodo