Roger Hicks
Veteran
While I agree with the sentiments expressed here from personal photography standpoint, I have to say that if you make a living (or even a side business) taking pictures of parties (wedding, birthday, anniversary, etc.), then you'll find out that you *do* need a 'real' camera.
Because you are no longer the decision maker whether a camera is real or not, those who see you at the event (including the paying client) are.
My wife would often use my pictures (M4-P, Fuji GA645wi or Olympus E-P2) in her final products to her clients, but they don't know/care about that.
All they remember was my wife showing up with an impressive black camera with big lenses (5D + all prime L lenses -- no zooms, she's *my* wife after all 😛 ).
Yup. I quote myself earlier in the thread:
Seriously, a lot of it is pure theatre. In pre-digital days, a lot of clients used to insist on 5x4 inch, even where 35mm (never mind roll-film) would have been adequate, because they didn't know how to use these 'professional' cameras, meters, film holders, etc., and therefore they were buying REAL expertise that they didn't have.
Whereas everyone knows that no skill, intelligence or anything else is required to operate a camera that the client can use himself: a rare piece of self-awareness.
Cheers,
R.