There are of course always exceptions.
Big sky with interesting clouds and light, for example, cries out for a wide angle of view.
Of course... but many focal lengths could work for that depending on where you stand and what you want.
There are of course always exceptions.
Big sky with interesting clouds and light, for example, cries out for a wide angle of view.
"...I soon found a way of quelling my loneliness. I would carry a Leica around with me, with that wonderful German-made M21 lens which had served me so well in Beirut, Afghanistan and Chad. It became my companion, my alibi against that feeling of guilt born from not having anything else to do...."
Raymond Depardon, Manhattan Out
.
Who are the established photographers who use wide angles 21mm or wider? or is this lens length that most feel is something that is only used for a specific purpose?
I agree. Sieff, Depardon, but also Bill Brandt for the wide angle nudes. And I remember a great shot by Elliott Erwitt of Buckminster Fuller in a helicopter which I'm sure was taken with a leica 21mm.
Sam
Me. I use the Pentax 15mm F4. Now that I've established myself do I count?
re: Bill Brandt nudes
Thanks Keith, I didn't know that about the camera Brandt used
Sam
Interesting. Olympus never made a 20. They made 21mms
I have a few prints of his, including this one taken with a 21mm:
![]()
Wilhelm Mikhailovsky used a Zorki and a Russar 20/f5.6. He was one of the first to use ultrawideangles for portraiture in the Soviet Union.
![]()
I doubt he still uses the Zorki, but he still uses ultrawideangles.
Well, my CV 21mm arrives tomorrow and I'll try my hand at actually making something worth looking at. This has helped me get some ideas of how it will fit into my photography.