NeeZee
Well-known
M3 + 21mm + hand-held flash and then in the tourists' faces. 😉
I'd take the 21 and 50. Forget the 135.
35 alone, or if you really need more than one lens, 28+50.
Nothing wrong with cliches. If you need some inspiration - just look at the amazing work of Renato D'Agostin on Venice. I wouldn't be surprised if it was taken with just a 50 mm alone. He's a leica M6+TriX user, if I remember correctly.
http://www.renatodagostin.com/venezia-2/#1
Hey, perhaps the R-D1 I spotted in Venice is still there. A perferct camera for Venice is the one bought in Venice.
You can find the camera store by taking the first left after Ponte di Rialto (in direction of San Marco). It is right before the first or the second bridge, can't remember exactly. They also had a few Bessas.
Maybe my Zeiss Ikon with some Ektar as a backup, but it could be my M2 or should I take the CLE or R3A?
Just out of curiosity - for that kind of decision, does it really make a difference whether you go to Venice or to the baker?