kxl
Social Documentary
I'd vote for the Nikon 85/1.4 AFD (or AIS) -- a little less than ultra-sharp and generally known as the king of bokeh. Perfect for portraiture.

Dirk
Privatier
Interestingly, the same lenses you mentioned for the RF are also great for the SLRs: 50/2, 85/2 and 105/2.5. I'll also add the 105/1.8, which i prefer over the 2.5 for the way it throws the background out of focus.
Texsport
Well-known
The Nikon 135/2 DC is widely recognized as the best Nikon portrait lens.
I have it and the old 105, and the 135/2 DC is superior in every way, including AF, if desired.
Texsport
I have it and the old 105, and the 135/2 DC is superior in every way, including AF, if desired.
Texsport
VinceC
Veteran
The older version of the Nikkor 105/2.5 is optically identical to the RF version. On SLR, I much prefer the ergonomics of an older 85/2. It is almost the same size as a 50mm lens.
Texsport
Well-known
The Nikon 135/2 DC is a large piece of metal and glass for sure
Texsport
Texsport
kshapero
South Florida Man
That's not portraiture, IMHO, that's a medical face exam.I'd like to tackle portraiture a bit more frequently, and I am looking for some good advice about the choice of lenses for my Nikon F2/FM3A cameras.
I normally use Zeiss ZF lenses with these bodies, but apart from the Planar 85/1.4 wide open, they are simply too sharp for anything but the most ruthless representation of men's faces.
G. by mfogiel, on Flickr
I was wondering, if there are some hidden gems, similar to the RF nikkors 50/2, 85/2 or 105/2.5 among the older SLR lenses.
I would ideally want low contrast, great bokeh and as little focus shift as possible. Top sharpness is not a primary requirement, rather the overall rendition at wider apertures in portraiture.
dbarnes
Well-known
Couldn't agree more that the Nikkor 105/2.5 and 85/1.8 and 85/2 lenses are the all-time classic portrait glass for MF Nikons. Don't discount what the 180/2.8 can do, either. No way to lose, choosing among those.
john_s
Well-known
That's not portraiture, IMHO, that's a medical face exam.![]()
Also the best example I've ever seen of really, really shallow depth of field!
I would go with a Softar 1. I had never heard of a duto filter, which seems to help with the bokeh or at least not messing with it. I found this site interesting, but no Softar example.
http://www.cs.mtu.edu/~shene/DigiCam/User-Guide/filter/filter-diffusion.html
venchka
Veteran
The older sonnar version of the 105mm f2.5. That would best as close to the rangefinder 105 as you could probably get.
Old 105 2.5
![]()
The original F mount 105 and RF lens are the same. The best!
Wayne
mfogiel
Veteran
Thanks to everybody for suggestions.
I already have the 135/2 DC, but I cannot focus it properly - somehow it generates back focus. This is something weird, by the way, because I have tested all my F mount lenses on FM3A (2 bodies) and F2, and a few of them are spot on, while most back focus quite evidently. In theory, this should not happen, as it comes to observing an image formed on the focusing screen, and not a rangefinder alignment. If the mirror would be off relative to the focal plane distance, it should be so in all cases, and not just in some. The most precise result comes from the Planar 85/1.4, so perhaps it has something to do fith the f stop - if you have any ideas, please let me know.
After reading your tips, I have bought an old 105/2.5 and 55/1.2 - they should arrive this week... The 85/2 offered had some technical issue, so I am still in the market for it if anybody has one to get rid off - I would prefer an EU transaction in case.
Thanks again.
Marek
I already have the 135/2 DC, but I cannot focus it properly - somehow it generates back focus. This is something weird, by the way, because I have tested all my F mount lenses on FM3A (2 bodies) and F2, and a few of them are spot on, while most back focus quite evidently. In theory, this should not happen, as it comes to observing an image formed on the focusing screen, and not a rangefinder alignment. If the mirror would be off relative to the focal plane distance, it should be so in all cases, and not just in some. The most precise result comes from the Planar 85/1.4, so perhaps it has something to do fith the f stop - if you have any ideas, please let me know.
After reading your tips, I have bought an old 105/2.5 and 55/1.2 - they should arrive this week... The 85/2 offered had some technical issue, so I am still in the market for it if anybody has one to get rid off - I would prefer an EU transaction in case.
Thanks again.
Marek
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
I already have the 135/2 DC, but I cannot focus it properly - somehow it generates back focus.
Does that happen only at f/2, or only at lower apertures, or no matter what?
mfogiel
Veteran
I have only measure tested it wide open, but photos taken in the field at f 2.8 or f4.0 had back focus as well. I have read, that apparently this phenomenon is well known among the DSLR users, who "dial in" autofocus correction, and apparently often change a few lenses, before finding one that works well.
Finglas
Established
50mm f1.8 series E
50mm f1.8 series E
I concur with the Nikon 50mm f1.8 series E lens - anywhere from f2.8, f4 even f5.6 in good natural light.
50mm f1.8 series E
I concur with the Nikon 50mm f1.8 series E lens - anywhere from f2.8, f4 even f5.6 in good natural light.
leicapixie
Well-known
i use the original 105 f2,5 Nikkor. It is similar to the Sonnar by Zeiss but with modifications. A superb lens for portraiture. Add a "softar" filter and you're cooking with gas! A really wonderful look. Do not stop down as it becomes severely sharp. Max aperture to about 5.6. The newer 105mm is generally sharper and hasn't the "Sonnar" look.
If one gets the special 135 with built-in diffusion, i think it would surpass the ordinary 105. My lens has been thru many decades of work..
If one gets the special 135 with built-in diffusion, i think it would surpass the ordinary 105. My lens has been thru many decades of work..
Last edited:
raid
Dad Photographer
The 105/2.5 Sonnar is a great lens. I recently bought a 85/2 before it goes up in price. Both are excellent lenses. Take your pick.
nikon_sam
Shooter of Film...
Couldn't agree more that the Nikkor 105/2.5 and 85/1.8 and 85/2 lenses are the all-time classic portrait glass for MF Nikons. Don't discount what the 180/2.8 can do, either. No way to lose, choosing among those.
My choice for shooting tight portraits...it's a great lens...
steveniphoto
Well-known
for the price, my 50 1.4 non ai worked great even wide open. it was dirt cheap too. i normally stick with 50s for portrait work and havent used any longer nikkor glass so i cant really comment on anything else.
RObert Budding
D'oh!
I'm partial to the Nikkor 105/2.5 AIS.
jaredangle
Photojournalist
WARNING, LARGE POST
mfogiel, I've got a collection here from the 85mm f/1.8 and the 135mm f/2 DC.
Some are color, but they could equally be applied to b/w.
Nikon F100, 85mm f/1.8 @ f/2.8, Fuji Astia (b/w in photoshop)
Nikon D700, 85mm f/1.8 @ f/4 or f/5.6
Nikon D700, 135mm f/2 @ f/4
Nikon D700, 85mm f/1.8 @ f/4
Nikon D700, 85mm f/1.8 @ f/2.8
Nikon D700, 85mm f/1.8 @ f/4 or f/5.6
Nikon D700, 85mm f/1.8 @ f/4 or f/5.6
Nikon D700, 85mm f/1.8 @ f/2 or f/2.8
mfogiel, I've got a collection here from the 85mm f/1.8 and the 135mm f/2 DC.
Some are color, but they could equally be applied to b/w.
Nikon F100, 85mm f/1.8 @ f/2.8, Fuji Astia (b/w in photoshop)

Nikon D700, 85mm f/1.8 @ f/4 or f/5.6

Nikon D700, 135mm f/2 @ f/4

Nikon D700, 85mm f/1.8 @ f/4

Nikon D700, 85mm f/1.8 @ f/2.8

Nikon D700, 85mm f/1.8 @ f/4 or f/5.6

Nikon D700, 85mm f/1.8 @ f/4 or f/5.6

Nikon D700, 85mm f/1.8 @ f/2 or f/2.8

dedmonds
Established
I've been very happy with the Nikkor 50/2 AI.

Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.