Most Used "Street" Lens

there are other focal lengths than 35mm?

Actually 35mm became such a popular lens among HCB-inspired photographers simply because it was the best lens to use with a Leica M.

On a SLR a 35mm is not wide enough and not long enough, on a RF with the space outside of the frame a 35mm looks wide enough (space outside of the frame) and long enough (the frame).


Personally, I think a small zoom lens that has a reach of 24-75mm is the best for street photography, but that is only for advanced shooters.
 
50 is pretty much all I need for street. the small 28 elmarit is in my pocket in case I need it for indoors/architecture/landscape
 
35 to me feels better in terms of composition as what many others have said. so when i use the leicas, i take along my 35 summilux

lately i've been using a 15mm Super Wide Heliar by voigtlander on a Nex-7, so it really equals out to a 21mm.
 
I own only two focal lengths, one is wide and slow (28mm Elmarit ASPH), and one is normal and fast (50mm Summilux ASPH).

Usage of each one depends on two things: 1) availability of light, 2) number density of subjects (e.g., people).

- Plenty of light + high number density: 28mm

- Plenty of light + low number density: 28mm + 50mm (depending if I want to be close to subject or not).

- Low light + low number density: 50mm

- Low light + high number density: 50mm but sometimes I wish there was a 28mm 1.4.
 
These days I use 35mm for street photography. I was using 50mm for a while and I really liked it. I used a Lomo which has a 32mm lens for a long time, so going back to 35 recently has been nice! I like the field of view that it gives you. I have dabbled in a 50mm on crop, so 85mm and that was kind of fun!
 
I prefer 35mm lenses for street photography (Summicron asph. or Summilux pre-asph.)
but sometimes it's a 50mm lens (Summicron IV).
Shorter lenses are more difficult because you have to get very, very near to your subject, but sometimes 21mm can be very interesting - and a challenge :)
 
Back
Top Bottom