arcimboldo
Member
never understood this term of "story telling"
Dear Bob,
Highlight: Not really, unless you know what it is. For that matter, even when you do know, you need to know what 'steerage' was.This image by Stieglitz tells a pretty full story:
http://legacy.earlham.edu/~vanbma/20th century/images/stieglitzsteerage1907.jpg
No photograph or series of photographs can tell a truly complete story, due to the limitations of the medium.
The Eddie Adams shot doesn't tell the whole story, though. Which Eddie regretted.
Highlight: Not really, unless you know what it is. For that matter, even when you do know, you need to know what 'steerage' was.
Last para: absolutely!
Also, a single shot cannot normally tell as much of a story as a photo essay.
Cheers,
R.
Sorry, what do you mean by 'context'? A picture on its own has no context, no matter how clever you are. You may recognize content, but clearly, this is nothing to do with context, and indeed, less to do with cleverness than with learning.A clever person can determine from the context of the image what is going on. All it takes is an eye and some thought. You don't have to know the title of the image. You just have to look and think.
No photograph or series of photographs can tell a truly complete story, due to the limitations of the medium.