EdwardKaraa
Well-known
What if Kodak never had the good/bad idea to invent digital sensors?
Just for fun, what film in 2013 would have been?
A couple of ideas:
- Super duper resolution grainless wide latitude film.
- Super hard coating, can't scratch the film even with a razor blade.
- Auto-developing film in the camera when you rewind it into the cassette.
- Auto-iso.
- Grain free iso 12500.
- Super duper scanner scans an entire roll in 36 seconds in raw format.
Just for fun, what film in 2013 would have been?
A couple of ideas:
- Super duper resolution grainless wide latitude film.
- Super hard coating, can't scratch the film even with a razor blade.
- Auto-developing film in the camera when you rewind it into the cassette.
- Auto-iso.
- Grain free iso 12500.
- Super duper scanner scans an entire roll in 36 seconds in raw format.
sanmich
Veteran
Kodachrome, Tri-X, Plus-X
oh...wait...:bang::bang:
oh...wait...:bang::bang:
daveleo
what?
Film should have been re-usable after scanning !
EdwardKaraa
Well-known
Sejanus.Aelianus
Veteran
Everything is for the best in this best of all possible worlds.
So, I'd be using Pan Gloss film to take candide pictures of El Dorado...

So, I'd be using Pan Gloss film to take candide pictures of El Dorado...
Sejanus.Aelianus
Veteran
Come to think of it, I'd probably be using Volt air batteries to power the camera...
sanmich
Veteran
Next, put the scanner in the camera instead of film....Film should have been re-usable after scanning !
FrankS
Registered User
But if this ideal film had no grain, it would look like ... digital. 
Clint Troy
Well-known
Simple: our cell phones would be accepting 110 film.
craygc
Well-known
But if this ideal film had no grain, it would look like ... digital.![]()
Exactly... I don't get this quest for grainlessness. Grain is what makes B&W great...
Spanik
Well-known
6400 iso Kodachrome that is just as great as the 64 iso. And it should come in 120 format. And can be develloped at any lab. Otherwise I'm not asking much.
vitaly66
slightly tilted
A dream for 2013: big rollfilm makes a comeback!
616 anyone?
616 anyone?
Godfrey
somewhat colored
Next, put the scanner in the camera instead of film....
We had that already. It was called Polaroid. ;-)
Clint Troy
Well-known
We had that already. It was called Polaroid. ;-)
No.
You're mixing scanner and printer.
sevo
Fokutorendaburando
Simple: our cell phones would be accepting 110 film.
I always wanted a cell phone with integrated Minox. Perhaps I'll build one some day - I have enough old phones and a Minox MX about...
icebear
Veteran
What if Kodak never had the good/bad idea to invent digital sensors?
Just for fun, what film in 2013 would have been?
A couple of ideas:
- Super duper resolution grainless wide latitude film.
- Super hard coating, can't scratch the film even with a razor blade.
- Auto-developing film in the camera when you rewind it into the cassette.
- Auto-iso.
- Grain free iso 12500.
- Super duper scanner scans an entire roll in 36 seconds in raw format.
You just forgot the USB3 port ....
Godfrey
somewhat colored
IMO, film already was/is everything it should be.
Were film still the dominant recording medium, I expect we would simply see more of the incremental development of tonal capture and dynamic range that we see today in films like Fuji ACROS.
G
Were film still the dominant recording medium, I expect we would simply see more of the incremental development of tonal capture and dynamic range that we see today in films like Fuji ACROS.
G
thegman
Veteran
I would have liked to see large format roll film. If they can make 120 in roll format, why not double the size and then you could have 4x5 roll film, in fact 4xanything, same as 120 can be 6x4.5 or 6x17.
DNG
Film Friendly
basically....
Just a scratch resistant base and emulsion sides
Zero Curl after drying, although Ilford and Kodak B&W are dry fairly flat.
Just a scratch resistant base and emulsion sides
Zero Curl after drying, although Ilford and Kodak B&W are dry fairly flat.
sevo
Fokutorendaburando
I would have liked to see large format roll film. If they can make 120 in roll format, why not double the size and then you could have 4x5 roll film, in fact 4xanything, same as 120 can be 6x4.5 or 6x17.
Has been done. 5" and 9 1/2" bulk rolls still are available - these are the regular sizes aerial cameras use. And 3 1/4" (QP) to 5" wide roll film types on wood/metal rolls similar to 120 were not that odd early on in the history of film. Kodak had some dozen variations on the topic of roll films wider than 3") - the last, 122, was cancelled not that far away, in the early seventies.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.