Ash
Selflessly Self-involved
I decided, in anticipation of the Canon 50/1,8 that I should hopefully be receiving shortly, that I'd swap around my only two existing ltm lenses (on my only two existing ltm cameras!).
Subjectively the collapsible summicron f/2 looks fairly well suited to the IIIc, and the Industar-50 looks well suited to the Standard. A larger lens on the bigger body, and a tiny lens on a tiny body.
So I switch them over..
WOW! A collapsible summicron feels as heavy as the Leica Standard body! The big bright and shiny silver lens stands out a mile on the dull black camera. The Industar-50 looks tiny on the IIIc now!
The most interesting thing, however, that I'm sure was not true of the summicron on the IIIc is that when looking through the little viewfinder on the Standard, I can see the front of the lens when pulled out, and what I see is the current aperture! It's as if the placement of the lens/viewfinder on the camera means that without moving the body it's easy to check what aperture is selected.
Has anyone else noted something like that with their lenses on cameras??
Subjectively the collapsible summicron f/2 looks fairly well suited to the IIIc, and the Industar-50 looks well suited to the Standard. A larger lens on the bigger body, and a tiny lens on a tiny body.
So I switch them over..
WOW! A collapsible summicron feels as heavy as the Leica Standard body! The big bright and shiny silver lens stands out a mile on the dull black camera. The Industar-50 looks tiny on the IIIc now!
The most interesting thing, however, that I'm sure was not true of the summicron on the IIIc is that when looking through the little viewfinder on the Standard, I can see the front of the lens when pulled out, and what I see is the current aperture! It's as if the placement of the lens/viewfinder on the camera means that without moving the body it's easy to check what aperture is selected.
Has anyone else noted something like that with their lenses on cameras??