Igor.Burshteyn
Well-known
My experience is a mixed bag - it's usually enough for pictures that don't contain vignettes and are not packed with details. Yesterday I downloaded to my gallery scan of shot which exhibits visually perceivable quality degradation when compressed to 150K.
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=56091
I usually crop to 800x600 and compress with jpeg quality factor 9-10 in order to get to 150K area. This time it was ~400K compressed as I used to, and I had to compress it with jpeg quality 4 (!). Result? jpeg artifacts all over the picture.
What is your experience?
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=56091
I usually crop to 800x600 and compress with jpeg quality factor 9-10 in order to get to 150K area. This time it was ~400K compressed as I used to, and I had to compress it with jpeg quality 4 (!). Result? jpeg artifacts all over the picture.
What is your experience?
ClaremontPhoto
Jon Claremont
Many gallery photos recently look very degraded.
Avotius
Some guy
someone needs to up the gallery upload size as well....come on what happened to NOT MAKING CHANGES here????