10 Superb Zuiko Lenses For Olympus OM 35mm SLRs

10 Exceptional Zuiko Lenses in Olympus OM Mount
Optimum optics for savvy Olympus 35mm SLR shooters

By Jason Schneider

When Yoshihisa Maitani, the world-renowned chief camera designer at Olympus, was creating his landmark Olympus OM-1 in the early ‘70s, he thought of it not merely as the world’s first ultra-compact full frame 35mm SLR, but as the cornerstone of a comprehensive pro-caliber system of photography that could go up against the likes of Nikon and Canon. As a true visionary who was, at the same time, a practical hands-on engineer, Maitani realized that the success of his ingenious world-class system hinged on creating a full line of high-performance Olympus OM lenses for what would eventually become the Olympus OM system of analog photography.

Olympus, like E. Leitz Wetzlar and Carl Zeiss before them, was a leading microscope maker long before they embarked on producing cameras—the company was founded in 1919 as a microscope and thermometer manufacturer and didn’t make their first camera, the Semi-Olympus l with the first Zuiko lens, until 1936. Their long experience in producing first rate optics for the extremely demanding scientific community certainly paid off when it came to creating the line of more than 60 world-class Zuiko OM lenses ranging from an 8mm f/2.8 Fisheye to a 1000mm f/11 super-telephoto. The line, which includes the 10 standouts featured here, remains one of the prime attractions of the exquisitely compact and competent Olympus OM system.

Normal 50mm lenses

Our top pick:

50mm f/1.4 G. Zuiko. This classic 7-element, 6-group Double Gauss formula lens is remarkably compact for a 50mm f/1.4 (though not as petite as the 50mm f/1.8 F. Zuiko), has an 8-bladed diaphragm, focuses down to 0.45cm (about 18 inches), performs creditably wide open and is extremely sharp starting at f/2 and improving at f/4 on down to f/11. It has very nice bokeh for a lens of this type, with extremely low levels of chromatic aberrations, and was in the top tier of 50mm f/1.4 lenses at its time of production, though not equal to the best current 50mm f/1.4s. Later multicoated versions labeled 50mm f/1.4 Zuiko (minus the G.) and often sporting an “MC “deliver crisper definition, especially wide open, but they’re generally more expensive. Price range: $75-$150

rs=w:1440,h:1440

50mm f/1.4 G. Zuiko Auto-S, original non-multicoated version

rs=w:1440,h:1440

50mm f/1.4 Zuiko Auto-S MC, later multicoated version


Alternatives

The standard 50mm f/1.8 F. Zuiko lens, by far the most common lens offered in Olympus OM mount, is very small and light, performs quite well at moderate apertures f/4-f/11 with some softness in the corners, and has good bokeh, especially at close distances. However, it’s not very sharp wide open, and early single coated examples tend to flare. Best news: It’s a bargain at $25-$50.

rs=w:1440,h:1440

50mm f/1.8 F. Zuiko Auto-S single coated version. Later Zuiko Auto S MC version (not shown is multicoated, less prone to flare.

The super-speed 7-element, 6-group 50mm f/1.2 Zuiko is a great choice for capturing vintage look bokeh at its widest apertures and for low light work It’s capable of very sharp imaging when stopped down and is much more compact and somewhat lighter than other 50mm f/1.2s but noticeably heftier than the 50mm f/1.4. The last version of this lens, with recessed front element and lens identification info on the outside of the barrel is said to offer better performance overall. Price range: $350-$550.

rs=w:1440,h:1440

50mm f/1.2 Zuiko, original version.

50mm Macros


Our top pick:

50mm f/2 Zuiko Auto Macro. One of very few f/2 normal macro lenses in any system, this innovative 9-element 7-group masterpiece focuses down to 8.3 inches (half life-size) enabling compelling close-ups and also works well as a fast normal lens for general shooting. It delivers exceptional imaging performance over its entire range, capturing sharp, high-contrast images with vivid color saturation along with asttractive bokeh. Downsides: It’s fairly large for am OM System Zuiko, has a 6-bladed diaphragm, it was made in small quantities and it’s avidly sought by collectors and therefore quite pricey. Price range: $300-$500.

rs=w:1440,h:1440

50mm f/2 Zuiko Macro is a great lens, but it's rare and pricey.

Our bargain pick:

50mm f/3.5 Zuiko Macro. This handy ultra-compact, lightweight normal macro employs a 5-element, 4-group design that yields sharp, contrasty images at normal distances, excellent image quality at around 1/10 life-size, and decent image quality at its minimum focus distance of 8 inches (half life-size). The multi-coated (MC) version has a little more snap, but it still doesn’t quite equal the brilliance of the 50mm f/2 Zuiko Auto Macro. Still, it’s a great walk-around lens for outdoor shooting, and it’s readily available at enticing prices. Price range: $60-$110.

rs=w:1440,h:1440

50mm f/3.5 Zuiko Auto-Macro. It's very good, readily available, and affordable.

Ultra-wide-angle lens

Our pick:

21mm f/3.5 G. Zuiko Auto-W. This tiny jewel-like (1.2-inch long, 6.3 ounce) ultra-wide employs a 7-element, 7-group design that provides a minimum focus distance of just under 8 inches. It delivers sharp high-resolution images with excellent contrast even at maximum aperture, it’s beautifully made and finished, and it handles very well on camera. Downsides: it exhibits notable vignetting (illumination falloff toward the edges and corners of the field) that improves only marginally on stopping down, and has moderately high levels of barrel distortion, both common defects with ultra-wide-angle lenses. Also, its moderate aperture results in a viewing image that’s dimmer and somewhat harder to focus than that provided by faster lenses. Despite these deficiencies it’s a pleasure to use, especially for outdoor subjects in daylight, and it captures images of surpassing quality. The later multicoated version, the 21mm f/3.5 Zuiko (sans G.) is even better in terms of “clarity” and flare suppression, but it typically carries a premium price. Price range: $250-$400.

rs=w:1440,h:1440

21mm f/3.5 Zuiko Auto-W, later multicoated version.

If price is no object:

21mm f/2 Zuiko Auto-W MC lens. This multicoated 11-element, 9-group masterpiece incorporates a floating-element design to achieve spectacular performance with minimal vignetting and distortion over its entire focusing range down to 7.9 inches. While it’s understandably somewhat larger and heavier than the truly tiny 21mm f/3.5 Zuiko, it’s still quite compact given its wide aperture. Apart from its size it’s superior to the 21mm f/3.5 in every respect--but it’s a collector’s prize that’s hard to find and breathtakingly expensive at about $3K per copy!

rs=w:1440,h:1440

21mm f/2 Zuiko Auto-W: Perfection at a princely price.

Wide-angle lens

Our Pick:

28mm f/2 Zuiko Auto-W MC. This relatively compact (1.69-inch long) 9-element, 8-group high-speed wide angle focuses down to 11.8 inches for compelling close-ups. It’s quite sharp in the center even at its widest apertures, and extremely sharp from corner to corner when stopped down to f/5.6. It’s prized by many for its distinctive “bubble bokeh” (round bubble-like patterns in specular highlights) especially when it’s used for high contrast, backlit subjects. By all means favor the later multicoated version (marked MC) which is far less prone to flare when shooting against the light, but all versions perform commendably, have attractive bokeh, and provide a distinctive vintage rendition, especially at their widest apertures. Price range: $280-$400.

rs=w:1440,h:1440

28mm f/2 Zuiko Auto-W MC multicoated version.

A unique high-speed semi-wide “pancake” Zuiko lens

40mm f/2 Zuiko Auto-S. This remarkable lens, a late multicoated addition to the Zuiko line, is the smallest, lightest, thinnest lens among all Olympus OM-mount primes. Technically, its 56-degree diagonal coverage makes it a semi-wide angle, which is ideal for street shooting and photojournalism, but it’s sometimes referred to as a normal lens because its focal length is close to the actual 43.3mm diagonal of the 24 x 36mm full frame 35mm format. This beautifully made 6-element, 6-group multicoated lens is a mere 1 inch long (hence the “pancake” designation), weighs in at a feather-light 4.9 ounces, and focuses down to 11.8 inches. Its performance is legendary—quite sharp even wide open with moderate falloff in the corners, and crisp, detailed capture with beautiful rendition across the entire field by f/4. Despite having a 6-bladed diaphragm that can result in “honeycomb” patterns in specular highlights, its bokeh is smooth and natural especially at its widest apertures, which facilitates the creative use of depth of field. And as you might expect, it balances and handles extremely well on camera. Indeed, the only real “problems” with this unique and outstanding lens are that it was made in limited quantities, the majority have been snapped up by avid collectors, and therefore it’s very hard to find and stunningly expensive. Price range: $800-$1,200.

rs=w:1440,h:1440

40mm f/2 Zuiko Auto-S "pancake" lens is a collector's prize.

A pair of outstanding f/2 medium telephoto Zuiko lenses

85mm f/2 F. Zuiko Auto-T/ 85mm f/2 Zuiko Auto-T MC. Both the earlier and later MC (multicoated) versions of this lens are quite compact considering their specs, and both are capable of creditable performance and beautiful rendition. The earlier 85mm f/2 F. Zuiko Auto-T, a non-multicoated 6-element, 5 group design based on the Zeiss Sonnar, it’s a bit soft wide open, and more prone to flare, but some claim it’s better for portraiture due to its “classic Sonnar” rendition. The multicoated 85mm f/2 Zuiko Auto-T MC version is a more modern 5-element, 4-group design that’s sharper across the field at f/2, delivers images with higher contrast overall, and has better correction for chromatic aberrations. Note: All versions marked F. Zuiko are the older 6-element design, but not all multicoated versions are marked MC. The latter, all marked Zuiko Auto T without the F, can be identified by a greenish tint to the coating. Both 85s focus down to 33.5 inches for compelling headshots and have 6-bladed diaphragms. Price range: $325-$500 (all types).

rs=w:1440,h:1440

85mm f/2 F. Zuiko Auto-T original non-multicoated version.

rs=w:1440,h:1440

85mm f/2 Zuiko Auto-T MC later multicoated version.


100mm f/2 Zuiko Auto-T. This superb wide-aperture medium telephoto features a 7-element, 6-group design that delivers images with excellent resolution, sharpness, and contrast across the field at maximum aperture thanks in part to its superior correction for chromatic aberrations and its floating element design that achieves consistently high image quality at all focusing distances down to its impressively close minimum focusing distance of 27.6 inches (0.19x). This lens is also prized for its brilliant color rendition and beautifully smooth, natural bokeh, which is enhanced by an 8-bladed diaphragm. It’s a fairly hefty 100mm lens at 18.3 ounces, but it’s very well balanced on camera and measures a compact 2.83 inches in length. The dozen or so examples we’ve examined all appear to be multicoated but do not bear the MC designation. Unfortunately, due to its collectors’ appeal it has become quite expensive. Price range: $625-$775.

rs=w:1440,h:1440

100mm f/2 Zuiko Auto-T, multicoated.

Longer telephotos

Our picks:

135mm f/2.8 Zuiko Auto-T MC. Reasonably compact at 3.15 inches long and weighing in at a moderate 12.7 ounces, this 5-element 5-group lens focuses down to 59 inches (0.25x) making it a good choice for head-and-shoulders portraits and general close-up work, but not true macro work. It’s quite sharp wide open, improves on stopping down to f/5.6 and has attractively smooth, natural bokeh despite its 6-bladed diaphragm. Like most classic non-apochromatic teles it has a modest amount of residual lateral chromatic aberration and its imaging performance does not equal that of current top-of-the-line 135s, which are much more expensive. Bottom line: This lens delivers satisfying overall performance and beautiful rendition, its f/2.8 maximum aperture facilitates the creative use of limited depth of field, and it’s readily available at “bargain” prices. Go for the later multicoated (MC) version rather than the earlier one marked “E. Zuiko” because the multicoated version provides greater “snap” and contrast and more effective flare control. Price range: $75-$125.

rs=w:1440,h:1440

135mm f/2.8 Zuiko Auto-T MC multicoated.

200mm f/4 Zuiko Auto-T MC. Fairly compact for a 200mm, measuring 5 inches in length and weighing in at a portable 18 ounces, this classic 5-element 4-group telephoto focuses down to 8.2 feet (0.31x), allowing a decent range of close-up options, and it balances and handles very well on Olympus OM SLRs. It’s reasonably sharp wide open, improves noticeably at f/5.6 on down, and like most long telephoto lenses of its era has a modest amount of residual lateral chromatic aberrations, but not enough to noticeably affect its image quality, which is very good overall. It captures beautiful bokeh with smooth transitions despite its 6-bladed diaphragm, but creative use of depth of field is limited by its modest maximum aperture. Bottom line: A very nice lens that delivers more than adequate sharpness and detail along with pleasing classic rendition at a surprisingly modest price. Go for the later multicoated (MC) version rather than the earlier one marked “E. Zuiko” because the multicoated version provides greater “snap” and contrast and more effective flare control. Price range: $60-$120.

rs=w:1440,h:1440

200mm f/4 Zuiko Auto-T MC multicoated.
 
Thank you Mr. Schneider.
The 50/1.4 is a great lens. I used to use a Canon FD system and also (less frequently) a Nikon system.

I own an OM 50/3.5 Macro in Canon FD mount. Someone must have owned an FD system and she/he wanted this lens.

50mm f/3.5 Zuiko Macro. This handy ultra-compact, lightweight normal macro employs a 5-element, 4-group design that yields sharp, contrasty images at normal distances, excellent image quality at around 1/10 life-size, and decent image quality at its minimum focus distance of 8 inches (half life-size). The multi-coated (MC) version has a little more snap, but it still doesn’t quite equal the brilliance of the 50mm f/2 Zuiko Auto Macro. Still, it’s a great walk-around lens for outdoor shooting, and it’s readily available at enticing prices. Price range: $60-$110.
 
I do not have too many OM lenses, but I do have 21mm f/3.5, 50mm f1.2 (also macro lens 50/3.), 85mm f2.0 (latest version). I also have 35mm f2.8 PC. I love all of them, but 50/1.2 and 85/2.0 are my the most loved ones.
 
I really like the 50mm f1.8 Zuikos, both the early single coated ones and the later multicoated ones...the 55mm f1.2 lens is very special with great bokeh.

I got both versions of the 50mm Zuiko macro lenses and they are as sharp as the finest Solingen knife. It took me a while to appreciate the first version of the 85mm Zuiko f2 lens but for portraiture it is the cat's meow.

For wide angle lenses the 24mm f2.8 Zuiko is my favourite and the 28mm f2.8 is a close second....the 35mm Zuiko f2.8 is not all that great when compared to the Rokkors of the same specs and even the lowly and budget priced Canon FD 35mm f3.5 lens out preforms it.

The Zuiko 100mm f2.8 is a great and light portrait lens and although I am not a fan of the 135mm focal length , the 135mm f2.8 Zuiko produces some of the best and creamy-est bokeh around, only the Pentacon f 2.8 135mm lens can almost equal it but that has manual diaphragm stop-down so it can be inconvenient to use if not shooting at full bore all the time.
 
I've loved the Zuiko lenses for years. Something about their rendition appeals to me much more than the other SLR lenses I've shot with. The late model (<1.1m serial) 50mm f1.4 is a real stand out. It's the one Zuiko I bought brand new. The other one for me is the 100mm f2 - IMO one of the best lenses in the entire lineup. I like the rest as well, but those are the ones that I keep with me always. I do have to admit that I have been recently keeping the 35-70mm f3.6 on my OM-4Ti while traveling for the flexibility and simplicity.
 
Interesting overview. Which camera out of the OM System is generally recommended when looking for a capable, but ideally mechanical tool?
 
Interesting overview. Which camera out of the OM System is generally recommended when looking for a capable, but ideally mechanical tool?


OM-1n for an all-mechanical camera with a meter and OM-2n if you want the absolute best aperture priority system of that era and don't mind being reliant on a few silver oxide batteries.

The OM-3 and 3Ti are all mechanical cameras with one of the most advanced multi-spot metering system ever put in a 35mm camera. They're priced into the stratosphere however, and the OM-4 and 4Ti are the exact same without the mechanical shutter.

I love the OM-4Ti for the tech, but the OM-2n feels more solid and operates more smoothly. Those are what I use. I've never understood the paranoia over having a shutter that relies on battery power. I've literally never had batteries die in a camera in the last 12 years. I replace them every 3 years or so.
 
Interesting overview. Which camera out of the OM System is generally recommended when looking for a capable, but ideally mechanical tool?

I am a fan of the Oly OM 1n ...simple and good, the older OM 1 will do too as they seem more available now on the used film camera market.

I have heard good things about the OM 3 camera, but they always seemed rare and expensive and highly desired and coveted.

I personally never cared for the auto exposure OM cameras but a lot of people liked them.
 
OM3 and OM4 came out with a multi-spot meter. The OM-4 was prone to need repair and the OM-3 was all manual ("professional"). Then a new version OM-4 came out and this one had fewer repair issues.
I wanted the M3 or M4 but I stuck with my Canon T90 and F1N cameras.
 
Well, I have the older 6 element 85mm and a pedestrian 50mm f1.8 but otherwise rounded out my collection with the not so expensive 24 f2.8 non multi coated followed by an early 35mm f2.8 and past the 50 and 85 going to a $15 ( at the time) 135 f3.5 and a $30 (again, at the time) 200 f5.
The 85 f2 was $175 and probably the most I’ve ever paid for a lens, there are few bargains in that focal length.
So, even a cheap guy like myself can outfit with a useable range of OM Zuikos without breaking the bank.
 
Zuiko glass is great, silvernosed versions is right up my street when used with b&w film. The 21f/3.5 has been on my radar for some time now but the prices made a big jump over the last couple of years.
 
Zuiko glass is great, silvernosed versions is right up my street when used with b&w film. The 21f/3.5 has been on my radar for some time now but the prices made a big jump over the last couple of years.


The great thing being if you were ok with a more vintage, lower contrast, more susceptible to flare piece of glass you would be well served by the older Zuiko silver nosed lenses. I don't fall in to that category, however I must admit after having shot with a few of them that they excel if that is the style/look that you go for. The collectors haven't started jacking the prices up on those yet, so they are extremely competitively priced on the used market. Many of the newer Zuikos are inflated to the point of absurdity like the 40mm f2, which is simply a bad value no matter how you frame it.
 
The great thing being if you were ok with a more vintage, lower contrast, more susceptible to flare piece of glass you would be well served by the older Zuiko silver nosed lenses. I don't fall in to that category, however I must admit after having shot with a few of them that they excel if that is the style/look that you go for. The collectors haven't started jacking the prices up on those yet, so they are extremely competitively priced on the used market. Many of the newer Zuikos are inflated to the point of absurdity like the 40mm f2, which is simply a bad value no matter how you frame it.

The Zuiko 40mm f2 lens was always expensive and not common even when it first came out.


Pair that lens with an OM 3 body or a OM 3 Ti body and you have a rare and a very desirable kit for any Olympus OM camera system aficionado.
 
Hi Jason,

Thank you for this list. Picking the best OM System Zuiko lenses is a tough game. There is alway one more favorite!

However, I would especially add the 90/2 to your list. The lens is phenomenal for portraits and never disappoints in other situations.


zuiko_90mm
by sreed2006, on Flickr
 
Thankyou Jason! Ive always enjoyed my 50 f1.4 and the esteemed reviewer just validated why that was so. &#55357;&#56833;

If only olympus had sought to harness its legacy of solid quality optics and superb mechanical ingenuity from its film days then maybe their fate would have been different...
 
Which mechanical OM SLR?

Which mechanical OM SLR?

Interesting overview. Which camera out of the OM System is generally recommended when looking for a capable, but ideally mechanical tool?

Personally I like the stone simple OM-1n or even the original OM-1, both of which are readily available and affordable, but require battery conversion. The all mechanical OM-3 is great, but it was made in small quantities, avidly collected, and is vastly overpriced IMHO. The OM-4 and OM-4 Ti are also excellent choices that have very sophisticated metering and auto flash systems. They're pricier than the OM-1, but not outrageously so, and generally worth the extra cost.
 
Kudos for the 24mm f/2.8 Zuiko

Kudos for the 24mm f/2.8 Zuiko

I really like the 50mm f1.8 Zuikos, both the early single coated ones and the later multicoated ones...the 55mm f1.2 lens is very special with great bokeh.

I got both versions of the 50mm Zuiko macro lenses and they are as sharp as the finest Solingen knife. It took me a while to appreciate the first version of the 85mm Zuiko f2 lens but for portraiture it is the cat's meow.

For wide angle lenses the 24mm f2.8 Zuiko is my favourite and the 28mm f2.8 is a close second....the 35mm Zuiko f2.8 is not all that great when compared to the Rokkors of the same specs and even the lowly and budget priced Canon FD 35mm f3.5 lens out preforms it.

The Zuiko 100mm f2.8 is a great and light portrait lens and although I am not a fan of the 135mm focal length , the 135mm f2.8 Zuiko produces some of the best and creamy-est bokeh around, only the Pentacon f 2.8 135mm lens can almost equal it but that has manual diaphragm stop-down so it can be inconvenient to use if not shooting at full bore all the time.

I agree that the 24mm f/2.8 Zuiko is an outstanding lens and I almost included it in my 10 Best Zuiko OM list, but dropped it at the last minute due to space requirements. I will be sure to include to and also the 100mm f/2.8 Zuiko in a follow-up piece on top Zuiko OM lenses. Thanks for your feedback.
 
Back
Top Bottom