$1500 Camera Choice

1750Shooter

Established
Local time
1:01 PM
Joined
Aug 22, 2011
Messages
191
I've got about $1500 to spend & I can't decide between a used M5 & 35mm or a new Bessa R3A with a 40mm. Any ideas/ recommendations? Thanks.
 
What he said. ^^
Lacking additional info, I'd say go Leica for build, investment, and feel.
 
If say go for my Leica m5 in the classifieds.

It's such a personal thing, totally whatever works for you and your needs.
 
In my opinion, the best middle FL lens for the money is C Summicron 40. In practice, it is the same optically as the much touted 35mm "bokeh king" which sells for USD 2000. Having this lens alone would justify to get the Bessa R3A. I have also a strong preference for AE in my rangefinders, as this is what's needed for the street - if I have the time to fiddle with non AE metering, then I have other cameras that can get me better image quality than 35mm, therefore, down the road, you might consider Leica M7.
 
Sorry, I wasn't too clear. I have held the M5( didn't get to use it) & was able to borrow am M6 for a weekend. The M5 just felt better in my hands & having to disassemble the M6(seemingly) to change film was a dealbreaker, for me. I was thinking either the Summilux 35 for the Leica or the 40mm Nocton for the Bessa. This camera will be my "companion" camera, replacing a Nikon FE w/35mm. Sorry.
 
Sorry, I wasn't too clear. I have held the M5( didn't get to use it) & was able to borrow am M6 for a weekend. The M5 just felt better in my hands & having to disassemble the M6(seemingly) to change film was a dealbreaker, for me. I was thinking either the Summilux 35 for the Leica or the 40mm Nocton for the Bessa. This camera will be my "companion" camera, replacing a Nikon FE w/35mm. Sorry.

I doubt you'll be able to find an M5 and 35 Summilux that will fit your budget...
 
bessa r2a (or r2m if you don't need aperture priority mode) + color skopar 35mm 2.5 is a best camera 'companion' for low money.
 
If you had your hands on the M-5 and liked it, really liked it, then you should buy it. Having a camera you actually like to use is the most important thing. Your other option is to wait and try out the Bessa you were thinking about. My guess is that having handled a Leica means the other camera will be something of a disappointment. Just a guess . . .

As to the lens buy the best 35mm lens you can afford. It won't be a Summilux on your budget, but does that really matter?
 
If you get an M5 make sure its sorted out. No reason to eliminate CV lenses on an M5 (not superwides though)...and I think a J12 won't work on an M5.
 
If you don't need the meter, I'd offer up an M4-p + the 40 Summicron. If you play your cards right you'll probably have money left over.
 
I'd maybe recommend the Zeiss Ikon and a Nokton 40/1.4...pretty cheap combo, AE, nice viewfinder (better than Leicas in many ways, in my opinion).
 
Which will give you better pictures? Why?

Or is it simply that you have $1500 burning a hole in your pocket?

Cheers,

R.


Kind of a bit of both, Roger. I primarily use film Nikons for what I do.
I've sold some photos & prints & although I'm no where in your & Francis' league, I enjoy what I do. I've bought a couple of Kodak Retinas, a Baldax, & a Yashica GTN & don't really like using them. The local camera shop owner says, "Buy a Leica so you know what a real rangefinder is & if you don't like it, you won't lose any money reselling.". Part of me wants to know exactly what the fuss is all about...
 
Back
Top Bottom