jorgef2002
Established
Hello fellows, need advice , I am looking for a Russian lens for my Leica
lll F ,I need a wide angle 35mm, please opinion on which one is a better one, thank you.
jorgef2002
lll F ,I need a wide angle 35mm, please opinion on which one is a better one, thank you.
jorgef2002
wolves3012
Veteran
Jupiter 12 is the only 35mm I know of (russian). It's sharp and contrasty but some say it's prone to flare - that's not my experience though. Make sure you get the LTM version, there is a Kiev bayonet mount too!
leica M2 fan
Veteran
The Jupiter 12 is the only FSU lens I know of. I have one that I use on my M2 and it is relatively (for me) flair free. I could not use a rubber hood on it because for some reason the apertures changed with any touch of the hood, but with a metal hood this doesn't happen.
The J-12 is the only FSU lens for a 39mm screw mount rangefinder. There are other 35mm lenses, but avoid them. They are probably for SLR's.
Dave Wilkinson
Veteran
The Jupiter 12, coated copy of a pre ww2 lens, there will be howls of indignation here - but I've had three through my hands, over the years and each was pretty dismal compared to most other 35mm glass i've tried!. No - they were not in need of adjustment, cleaning, hazy or anything else, so I must have been unlucky three times?. You will get all the usual stuff about good and bad samples, assembly workers had too much vodka, etc, etc, but by the time you had sent one to one of the recognised lens wizards for a magic spell, you would have been far better of getting something else - or maybe saving for a VC Skopar. I must now run for cover! 
Cheers, Dave
Cheers, Dave
januaryman
"Flim? You want flim?"
The skopar is a very decent lens with great sharpness and contrast. Nothing wrong with that suggestion.
Spider67
Well-known
I recommend the skopar! Nothing wrong with a J 12....on a Kiev or a Zorki
Dave Wilkinson
Veteran
....but don't forget you still have to shove a fat digit in the front - to alter the aperture!I recommend the skopar! Nothing wrong with a J 12....on a Kiev or a Zorki
Dave.
newspaperguy
Well-known
Unlike Dave, I've had pleasant results with both J-12s (ltm & Kiev) so I guess it's a crapshoot.
R
Roberto
Guest
Hello fellows, need advice , I am looking for a Russian lens for my Leica
lll F ,I need a wide angle 35mm, please opinion on which one is a better one, thank you.
jorgef2002
J12!

januaryman
"Flim? You want flim?"
Good God! What did you say to this gal to get that reaction???!!! 
J12!no doubt...
![]()
R
Roberto
Guest
Good God! What did you say to this gal to get that reaction???!!!![]()
Eeheh
jorgef2002
Established
Thank you all, I think that I will wait and go for a cv skopar, better safe than sorry, thank you for the advice gentlemen. regards.
jorgef2002
jorgef2002
Last edited:
JustPlainBill
Established
Hi,
A 35mm Nikon in Leica screwmount did very nicely on my IIf many years ago. You may be able to find one on the used market.
JustPlainBill
A 35mm Nikon in Leica screwmount did very nicely on my IIf many years ago. You may be able to find one on the used market.
JustPlainBill
payasam
a.k.a. Mukul Dube
I had a J-12 which gave good service on a Leica IIIc, a Zorki 1C and a Leica M2. A little flare prone, perhaps. Did not use a hood as the front is deeply recessed in the mount. Would have kept it if I hadn't got a CV Ultron 35/1.7. It isn't advisable on a metered M body because of the protruding rear element.
Graybeard
Longtime IIIf User
Many users, myself included, have found the Jupiter 12 to be quite a decent performing 35mm lens, the bad luck of others here notwithstanding. While there certainly are problems with some Russian LTM lenses, the Jupiter 3 and Jupiter 9 in particular, the Jupiter 12 and Jupiter 8 are far more likely to be found in good-performing condition.
No doubt the more modern Voigtlander lens is sharper wide open - it would be astonishing if it weren't, being sixty years more advanced in design and costing probably 7-10x the common cost of a Jupiter 12.
Jorge may well want to buy a Jupiter 12 to see if a 35mm lens suits him at all. The risk is relatively small considering the low cost of this lens.
No doubt the more modern Voigtlander lens is sharper wide open - it would be astonishing if it weren't, being sixty years more advanced in design and costing probably 7-10x the common cost of a Jupiter 12.
Jorge may well want to buy a Jupiter 12 to see if a 35mm lens suits him at all. The risk is relatively small considering the low cost of this lens.
Last edited:
blazejs
Established
Talking about Jupiter's 12 bokeh I really like shoot with it wide open, especially from short distance. This gives also cool third dimension view to the picture.
Bigger: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3088/2875341697_3ce5d99e55_o.jpg
Bigger: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3019/2875318127_90a3c0a131_o.jpg

Bigger: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3088/2875341697_3ce5d99e55_o.jpg

Bigger: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3019/2875318127_90a3c0a131_o.jpg
Florian1234
it's just hide and seek
Here's an example of my Jupiter-12 wide open:
It surely is a very nice lens with the charming touch of the 60's or 70's and lower contrast than modern lenses have.

It surely is a very nice lens with the charming touch of the 60's or 70's and lower contrast than modern lenses have.
blazejs
Established
It surely is a very nice lens with the charming touch of the 60's or 70's and lower contrast than modern lenses have.
Mine is from 1990. I've noticed some more contrast than in my older FSU lenses. But I plan to get also one in Kiev mount and I'm hunting for something older. Then I'll be able to compare.
Florian1234
it's just hide and seek
Mine is from 1990. I've noticed some more contrast than in my older FSU lenses. But I plan to get also one in Kiev mount and I'm hunting for something older. Then I'll be able to compare.
Mine is late 1970's, 1979 I think.
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.