50/2 and small budget

pmu

Well-known
Local time
10:18 AM
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
388
Ok, here's the deal; I need 50/2 lens for my kAmerA and I have this classic problem, small budget. So, modern 50/2 summicron is out of the question. Only 50/2 leica lens which I possibly could afford would be an older model in eye-sore shape. I have two questions:

- Hexanon 50/2 lens. I believe this is very good lens, right? What could be the price for used 50/2 hexanon in excellent condition? I know, it could be whatever the seller asks, but... you know.

- No money for Leica 50/2, so what would be the second best choice? New zeiss could be the one, but I get stomach aches when I even think of buing non-used equipment. Relatively easy to find 50/2 lens with good image quality and little-money-to-spend type of price - what lens would it be?

Pete
 
1) Canon 50mm F1.8 with Leica thread mount to M adapter. Should run under $200 for lens and adapter.

2) Summarit 50mm F1.5 in M-Mount and a CLA, run under $250. -My two did-
 
When the Hexanon 50mm/f2 was in production, they were going for $200-250 new. Add $50-100 to the price now that they have become more scarce. This is a super lens which rivals the Summicron in optical performance and may be more robust mechanically.

The Nokton 50mm/f1.5 is a very good lens optically, very sharp wide open. I believe that this goes for about $300.

The Canon(aka Serenar) 50mm/1.8 and the Nikkor 50mm/2 a fine lenses with performance similar to the first generation Summicrons. The Canon often sells for under $150 and the Nikkor for $200. You'll need a LTM/M mount adaptor.

For the lowest price, try a Russian Jupiter-8 50mm/f2 (with LTM.M adapter). The lens (get a black one) will probably cost you less than the adapter (B&H has the best adaptor price). These can be astonishingly good value for the money and you can have a lens right away to do some shooting.
 
i second the hexanon. much better bokeh wide open and closeup than the modern summicron, with the same sharpness and more pleasing tonality.
 
Hi - I copped a Nikon Nikkor 50mm f/2 LTM for undred a hundred bucks that I'm going to use on a refurbished IIIa. Admittedly, I'm spending some more $ to have it cleaned and lubed, but that hardly counts. Dante Sella writes encouragingly about this particular lens, which was made for Tower cameras. From what I understand, these early Nikon lenses are a good match with Leica bodies.

Keep shooting.
 
I will vote for the Canon 50/1.8 for bang for the buck and a good moderately fast lens.

Vote two for the all time best $30 spent, Jupiter 8. Get one off ebay, black that is described as new or like new. I have bought two wonderful ones like this.

Vote three, get a Summicron. Either a collapsible or rigid will run you under $350 with a little shopping.
 
If you value sharpness over beauty, and you're in a budget, then forget Leica.

But you can get a Summar for around $120, or a very good Summitar (very sharp if you stop down by f/4, but wide open it has a very unique signature) for about $175-250 depending where you get it. I've seen an Elmar (1960's I think, collapsible) that goes for about $200, but it's got some fog, a CLA would run you about $65-90

And then there's the Jupiter 55mm, dirt cheap; everybody that owns one loves it.
 
Another vote for the Canon 50/1.8 - if you're on a budget, it's a great option.

Actually, it's a pretty good option even if you aren't on a budget.
 
I have both the Canon 50/1,8 and the Summitar 50/2 and I cannot decide which I like better. The Canon seems to have better feel and ergonomics for my taste but it's almost too sterile in it's sharpness (not a bad thing really just not what I always want) while the Summitar has a more "classic' look to its images. I'll probably keep them both. Got my Canon for about $150 and my Summitar for $135.
 
The only one of the lenses mentioned here that I know is the Jupiter-8 and I do well love it. There is a look to that lens, like all Sonnars, that is as hard to describe as that infamous Lieca "glow". I can't say you'll like it, you'll have to decide that I fear. But it is unique and I do like it.

The biggest problem I see here is your aversion to pre-owned lenses. It's going to be very difficult to find any new lens that fits your needs. I wish you well in your search, but I'll still advise a quiet look at a nice little Jupiter-8... ;)

Good luck,

William
 
Thanks for your advices!

I forgot to mention that I live in Finland, so that narrows out some options... But I will try to find those mentioned lenses.

About that hexanon 50/2 - I was offered one such lens in "like new" condition at the price of 250 euros (300-320 usd?) and I believe that there might be some room for negotiating. Slightly more expensive than in U.S. but easier to buy because the seller lives in Finland...
 
zeos 386sx said:
There is a nice page with pictures about the Russian Jupiter and Industar lenses
http://home.att.net/~wayne.cornell/camera/lenslist.html

By all accounts the Industar 61 55mm f2.8 is excellent optically - and inexpensive. There is one being listed on eb-y with a "Buy It Now" price of US $7.00. I know it is not an f2.0 but for that little money what do you have to lose by trying it?

Just to clarify - the adapter to this lens is just the regular screwmount-->M 50mm adapter?

VC M39-->M adapter is around 50-60 euros and the lens is around 10-20 euros shipped...
 
Last edited:
pmu said:
Just to clarify - the adapter to this lens is just the regular screwmount-->M 50mm adapter?

VC M39-->M adapter is around 50-60 euros and the lens is around 10-20 euros shipped...

Kind of ironic, but yes, the adapter may be more expensive than a Jupiter 8. I think it is worth buying just to have because it is so inexpensive and so so good.

Yes, you will need the correct LTM to M adaptor to trigger the 50mm framelines on a Leica RF camera.

What camera are you using by the way?
 
pmu said:
Thanks for your advices!

I forgot to mention that I live in Finland, so that narrows out some options... But I will try to find those mentioned lenses.

About that hexanon 50/2 - I was offered one such lens in "like new" condition at the price of 250 euros (300-320 usd?) and I believe that there might be some room for negotiating. Slightly more expensive than in U.S. but easier to buy because the seller lives in Finland...

$300 ish US is a very good price for the 50/2 Hexanon. You can't go wrong with this lens. If as you state you can pick one up easily then don't look any further. It is mechanicly and opticlly the match of a modern Summicron. It has a 40.5mm filter ring which is relatively standard which is a big plus.

Heck, you guys are doing it to me, I may have to go look at that on on ebay again.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom