proenca
Proenca
Cheers people,
Im after a 50mm lux pre asph II, all the photos I-ve seen from it, bokeh and signature wise, made me weep ( well my credit card to be honest )
But on the search for it, I found at least two types, for example >
Leica M 50mm Summilux Serial # 3690199 has 46mm filter size
but this one
Leica M 50 mm Summilux Serial # 3590153 has a 43mm filter size and does look "older" ( although its mint )
So I assume that the 46mm filter sized one is the II and the 43mm is the I ? There is a page to verify the serial number and to see if its a I or a II ? both are good? or any particular things about I or II? pretty much all the photos I-ve seen from the 50'lux pre/asph II are gorgeous
Thank you for the help as usual .)
Im after a 50mm lux pre asph II, all the photos I-ve seen from it, bokeh and signature wise, made me weep ( well my credit card to be honest )
But on the search for it, I found at least two types, for example >
Leica M 50mm Summilux Serial # 3690199 has 46mm filter size
but this one
Leica M 50 mm Summilux Serial # 3590153 has a 43mm filter size and does look "older" ( although its mint )
So I assume that the 46mm filter sized one is the II and the 43mm is the I ? There is a page to verify the serial number and to see if its a I or a II ? both are good? or any particular things about I or II? pretty much all the photos I-ve seen from the 50'lux pre/asph II are gorgeous
Thank you for the help as usual .)
nikon_junkie
Established
I had the version #1 and can email you a few images. Loved it and regret selling it.
Can't speak for the newer glass, but if you choose not to go the version 1 route let me know where to find it.
Can't speak for the newer glass, but if you choose not to go the version 1 route let me know where to find it.
Harry Lime
Practitioner
There are three different optical formulas of this lens:
50mm F1.4 Summilux 1959-1961 - Type 1 SN#1,645,300-1,844,000
This version was only made for two years and was replaced by Type 2, which featured a new optical computation and increased performance (especially at 1.4).
50mm F1.4 Summilux 1962-1994 - Type 2 SN#1,844,001-N/A
This is the most common version of the Lux. This optical formula was in production for over 40 years until the arrival of the ASPH model and is very, very good. This version with the clip on hood focuses as close as 1 meter (100cm).
50mm F1.4 Summilux-M 1995 - 2005/6 - Type 3 SN# ???
Same optical formula as Type 2, but a built in collapsible hood (which doesn't lock in place! ) and now focuses to .7 meters (70cm). This is the version I have and I prefer the ability to focus closer. Performance is identical to Type 2. Same optical formula as Type#2
50mm F1.4 Summilux-M ASPH 2006 - present Type 4 SN# ???
A totally new optical formula with ASPH technology and a floating element for increased close up performance. Reportedly this is the highest performing 50mm lens ever made for 35mm photography. Cost: circa $2700 dollars.
50mm F1.4 Summilux 1959-1961 - Type 1 SN#1,645,300-1,844,000
This version was only made for two years and was replaced by Type 2, which featured a new optical computation and increased performance (especially at 1.4).
50mm F1.4 Summilux 1962-1994 - Type 2 SN#1,844,001-N/A
This is the most common version of the Lux. This optical formula was in production for over 40 years until the arrival of the ASPH model and is very, very good. This version with the clip on hood focuses as close as 1 meter (100cm).
50mm F1.4 Summilux-M 1995 - 2005/6 - Type 3 SN# ???
Same optical formula as Type 2, but a built in collapsible hood (which doesn't lock in place! ) and now focuses to .7 meters (70cm). This is the version I have and I prefer the ability to focus closer. Performance is identical to Type 2. Same optical formula as Type#2
50mm F1.4 Summilux-M ASPH 2006 - present Type 4 SN# ???
A totally new optical formula with ASPH technology and a floating element for increased close up performance. Reportedly this is the highest performing 50mm lens ever made for 35mm photography. Cost: circa $2700 dollars.
MikeL
Go Fish
Harry, I think your post should be a sticky.
Biggles
My cup runneth amok.
Type 2, 43mm filter thread, chrome, circa 1964:
Wide-open:

Wide-open:

JNewell
Leica M Recidivist
To circle back on a question in the original post, the filter size for the "type 2" below is E43, and the filter size for the "type 3" is E46.
Harry Lime said:There are three different optical formulas of this lens:
50mm F1.4 Summilux 1959-1961 - Type 1 SN#1,645,300-1,844,000
This version was only made for two years and was replaced by Type 2, which featured a new optical computation and increased performance (especially at 1.4).
50mm F1.4 Summilux 1962-1994 - Type 2 SN#1,844,001-N/A
This is the most common version of the Lux. This optical formula was in production for over 40 years until the arrival of the ASPH model and is very, very good. This version with the clip on hood focuses as close as 1 meter (100cm).
50mm F1.4 Summilux-M 1995 - 2005/6 - Type 3 SN# ???
Same optical formula as Type 2, but a built in collapsible hood (which doesn't lock in place! ) and now focuses to .7 meters (70cm). This is the version I have and I prefer the ability to focus closer. Performance is identical to Type 2. Same optical formula as Type#2
50mm F1.4 Summilux-M ASPH 2006 - present Type 4 SN# ???
A totally new optical formula with ASPH technology and a floating element for increased close up performance. Reportedly this is the highest performing 50mm lens ever made for 35mm photography. Cost: circa $2700 dollars.
Avotius
Some guy
my looking very very hard for the so called latest pre asph with the 46mm filter mount, the older ones are said to be the same except the older coatings (which I dont know is it makes a difference or not) and the 1 meter minimum focus. Also I see them on ebay going fro around 700-800 so no problem finding one, but I would be careful since it is an older lens, make sure you get a good one
pmu
Well-known
I just bought version 2 summilux (43mm filter thread). I was wondering:
is there any other clip-on hoods than Leica's own? There is 43mm threaded hoods on ebay, but in that case I couldn't use uv-filter... well, actually I never use uv-filters anyway... What would you do?
is there any other clip-on hoods than Leica's own? There is 43mm threaded hoods on ebay, but in that case I couldn't use uv-filter... well, actually I never use uv-filters anyway... What would you do?
nikon_junkie
Established
Hope that wasn't your Lux I just swiped... I'll send samples of my earlier lens in awhile.
peter_n
Veteran
I use the eBay non-vented threaded hoods on almost all of my Leica lenses. They are excellent.pmu said:I just bought version 2 summilux (43mm filter thread). I was wondering:
is there any other clip-on hoods than Leica's own? There is 43mm threaded hoods on ebay, but in that case I couldn't use uv-filter... well, actually I never use uv-filters anyway... What would you do?
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
Harry Lime said:There are three different optical formulas of this lens:
50mm F1.4 Summilux 1959-1961 - Type 1 SN#1,645,300-1,844,000
This version was only made for two years and was replaced by Type 2, which featured a new optical computation and increased performance (especially at 1.4).
50mm F1.4 Summilux 1962-1994 - Type 2 SN#1,844,001-N/A
This is the most common version of the Lux. This optical formula was in production for over 40 years until the arrival of the ASPH model and is very, very good. This version with the clip on hood focuses as close as 1 meter (100cm).
50mm F1.4 Summilux-M 1995 - 2005/6 - Type 3 SN# ???
Same optical formula as Type 2, but a built in collapsible hood (which doesn't lock in place! ) and now focuses to .7 meters (70cm). This is the version I have and I prefer the ability to focus closer. Performance is identical to Type 2. Same optical formula as Type#2
50mm F1.4 Summilux-M ASPH 2006 - present Type 4 SN# ???
A totally new optical formula with ASPH technology and a floating element for increased close up performance. Reportedly this is the highest performing 50mm lens ever made for 35mm photography. Cost: circa $2700 dollars.
This is what I say (including Zen Shooter), but most people insist on lumping the 1962-1994 and 1995-2005 versions together into "Version II", and this is what confuses the hell out of people. The 1995-2005 version (E46) is very different construction-wise from the Version II lens, although the optical formula is reportedly the same, yet the Version III (yes, Version III, pre-asph) has "improved" coatings and you can close-focus down to 0.7 meters. Physically, and in some practical ways, it's a different version.
This one is the oddball in Leica nomenclature.
proenca
Proenca
Gabriel, thank you .) after all this talk and few dozen's of Flickr's emails ( you got one by the way, gorgeous photos - you use v2 or v3 ? ) I got into that conclusion...
Anyway, i have a problem.. Harry Lime description is fantastic but I found one Summilux 50 1.4 that doesnt fit that description :
Is 46mm filter thread, doesnt have a collapsible hood and it looks like an ASPH.. is certainly not a v2 ( i looked into a v2 and they are different ) and doesnt fit the v3 bill... what is it ?
Anyway, i have a problem.. Harry Lime description is fantastic but I found one Summilux 50 1.4 that doesnt fit that description :
Is 46mm filter thread, doesnt have a collapsible hood and it looks like an ASPH.. is certainly not a v2 ( i looked into a v2 and they are different ) and doesnt fit the v3 bill... what is it ?
proenca
Proenca
by the way, should I expect the same "creamy dreamy" bokeh from a v3 than a v2 ?
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
???? Do you have a photo of it? (and yes, although the v2 is a little "softer" in the oof areas, and therefore "creamier", I think this may be due to the coatings, and something desirable for all-B&W work)proenca said:Is 46mm filter thread, doesnt have a collapsible hood and it looks like an ASPH.. is certainly not a v2 ( i looked into a v2 and they are different ) and doesnt fit the v3 bill... what is it ?
proenca
Proenca
well this is it >
is it a v3 or a vwhatever ?
and this i belive is a V2 no ? similar to yours ?
http://www.shphoto.de/bild/13687.jpg
is there any risks ( apart from the obvious ones ) buying a v2 ? is there loads of lemons ? should I be better and buy a v3 (because its newer) or its safe to buy a v2 ? im ordering online, cant see the lens beforehand, both seem mint though

is it a v3 or a vwhatever ?
and this i belive is a V2 no ? similar to yours ?

is there any risks ( apart from the obvious ones ) buying a v2 ? is there loads of lemons ? should I be better and buy a v3 (because its newer) or its safe to buy a v2 ? im ordering online, cant see the lens beforehand, both seem mint though
maddoc
... likes film again.
Now I have a question about the Summilux 50mm vs 3 pre-asph E 46 (Leica number: 11 856): On the box is written "silver chrome finish" but the manual states "the barrel is made from brass and titan finished" I know that there is a special "titan" version (barrel engraving in grey ?) sold as set with the titanium body M6 (or M7 ?) . So are there three different color versions available, black, silver chrome finish, and titan ? 
-Gabor
-Gabor
maddoc
... likes film again.
proenca
Proenca
yep. that I can reply myself > there are three versions, black, silver and titan. proof here >

Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.