a nude is still a nude with HP5

[djonesii]

Dear all;

I had a grafmatic with me, and shot six, kept four.

These were processed at a commercial lab as I had some issues w/ the first set from the grafmatic. I'm now sure that there are no light leaks in the back, and it was some other user error w/ the first set.

As usual, these are nudes, if they offend, or violate work policies, don't look.

user= Guest ( yes, that is a capital G!)
pass= matrix
The link to the film set is:

http://www.jonesii.net/2009_09_20_hp/

The full set w/ Film/Polaroid/Digital is at:

http://www.jonesii.net/2009_09_20_robin_film/index.html


The Polaroid conversion w/ the Grafmatic is a blast!

As usual, C&C are welcome.

 

[Borghesia]

Nice series of pictures, did you used a one-light set up with a beauty disc ?

 

[Koni Kowa]

Here is a nice nude serie, but what is this black blur on the sex ?! It's ridiculous...

 

[FrankS]

A move-able tattoo, cool.

 

[robklurfield]

nice work.

 

[djonesii]

No black blur on sex, ....just light fall off, look at some of my other stuff, no trouble shooting all the bits ...

have you every had a Homer moment in photography, I just did. In programming, its call headslap(); in photography, it's "does it matter which way the negative goes on the scanner?? .... doh!

Dave

 

[Koni Kowa]

Well, 'light fall off' if you want. The question is why ? And it's not well made. I regret it because the pics are really good apart from that.