Vickko
Veteran
Anyone know of recent sales of RF 2.1cm Nikkor?
I see a bunch on ebay but no sales. No sales at Westlicht that I could see either.
regards
Vick
I see a bunch on ebay but no sales. No sales at Westlicht that I could see either.
regards
Vick
Phil_F_NM
Camera hacker
It looks like people just don't want to pay the ridiculous prices.
Why do you ask? Have one for sale?
Phil Forrest
Why do you ask? Have one for sale?
Phil Forrest
Vickko
Veteran
Yes, bought it years ago.
Once in a while think about whether it deserves a more appreciative owner.
But it is so rare that I think if I needed money, I should liquidate my more common items.
Once in a while think about whether it deserves a more appreciative owner.
But it is so rare that I think if I needed money, I should liquidate my more common items.
raid
Dad Photographer
Such a lens (SLR version with finder) could be bought for $400-$500 two years ago. The RF version will cost more.
In your case, Vikko, check what Kevin Cameras asks for, and sell your for 20%-30% less.
In your case, Vikko, check what Kevin Cameras asks for, and sell your for 20%-30% less.
Vickko
Veteran
Thanks RAID. I also looked at keh.com. They have an online quote for me selling the lens to them and typically quote 50% of their selling price. They don't even list the 2.1cm f4 RF as an option.
Corran
Well-known
It seems to me that most of the very rare / valuable Nikkor RF lenses have made their way to dealers or at least highly optimistic people that have priced them beyond their true value, either as a collectible or a usable lens.
Another example is the 5cm f/1.1. There are several up for sale on eBay at $4k, up to $6k and more. When one came up at auction last year with some negligible problems that could be fixed by a repair tech for a couple hundred bucks tops, it sold for around $1500.
Those lenses seem to be overpriced at around 50% at least, so using that same logic with the 2.1cm, I think realistically it should really be priced at $3k to $4k, if one actually needed to sell it.
The problem with the 2.1cm of course is you can get the same lens w/ F-mount and a cheap F body w/ no prism for less than $700 or so. Though the 2.1cm F-mount has been climbing in price rapidly for some reason. I have an extra that I will be selling myself. Point being is the 2.1cm is of less interest to shooters, only collectors.
Another example is the 5cm f/1.1. There are several up for sale on eBay at $4k, up to $6k and more. When one came up at auction last year with some negligible problems that could be fixed by a repair tech for a couple hundred bucks tops, it sold for around $1500.
Those lenses seem to be overpriced at around 50% at least, so using that same logic with the 2.1cm, I think realistically it should really be priced at $3k to $4k, if one actually needed to sell it.
The problem with the 2.1cm of course is you can get the same lens w/ F-mount and a cheap F body w/ no prism for less than $700 or so. Though the 2.1cm F-mount has been climbing in price rapidly for some reason. I have an extra that I will be selling myself. Point being is the 2.1cm is of less interest to shooters, only collectors.
raid
Dad Photographer
I did not know that the RF version sells for that much money.
Corran
Well-known
I did not know that the RF version sells for that much money.
Yep. The 3 examples that I know of that are actively for sale, and have been for years, are two on eBay and one at Igor Camera. Two of them are about $7,000, the other is over $8,000.
ChrisLivsey
Veteran
I did not know that the RF version sells for that much money.
They don't sell for that kind of money, which is why they remain for sale
If anyone has the lens and no finder I can point them to dealer who has one for £349, (I'm regrettably not on commission) which I have no idea if that is a good price or not.
Some 21's might only be worth a few thousand dollars, others would be worth 10k, all depends on condition, boxes, shade etc. I have seen 21's in marginal condition, and a few which are like new, with box etc. The rear cap alone, if it is missing or broken lowers the price by 1000.
Nikon only made 298 of these lenses. I wonder how many still have intact rear caps?





Vickko
Veteran
yep. I don't have the original rear lens cap.
Corran
Well-known
You are thinking like a user.
True, but still the prices on the 5cm f/1.1 seem to be out of line with their value. On the other hand, CV never made that 50mm f/1.1 Nokton for S-mount unfortunately, so it does represent an item almost impossible to get for the Nikon RF system...
dugwerks
Member
Hi Vic
Sold a 2.1 rf about 15 months ago at the Chicago show $4500 no hood but with correct caps
cheers
douglas
Sold a 2.1 rf about 15 months ago at the Chicago show $4500 no hood but with correct caps
cheers
douglas
farlymac
PF McFarland
Nikon only made 298 of these lenses. I wonder how many still have intact rear caps?
![]()
Oh man, I saw one of those caps in a camera store one day, rummaging through the pile. Why I didn't snatch it up, I don't know.
PF
Oh man, I saw one of those caps in a camera store one day, rummaging through the pile. Why I didn't snatch it up, I don't know.
PF
At a guess, I'd say the cap you spotted was for the F-mount version of the lens. They're far more numerous and look very similar
raid
Dad Photographer
I find it amazing that an original lens rear cap is important to get.
phofseth
Established
excellent star effect
excellent star effect
No idea of price, but years ago I adapted an F mount 21 to Leica and used it until the finder gave up.
When the sun was in the frame it created a quite nice star-effect, and its depth of field of course gave nice depth to landscape snaps.
Conclusion; the F-version may still be worth using rather than hoarding.
p.
excellent star effect
No idea of price, but years ago I adapted an F mount 21 to Leica and used it until the finder gave up.
When the sun was in the frame it created a quite nice star-effect, and its depth of field of course gave nice depth to landscape snaps.
Conclusion; the F-version may still be worth using rather than hoarding.
p.
I find it amazing that an original lens rear cap is important to get.
Not so sure if its important to get, but the rear cap for the S-mount 2.1cm certainly is expensive to get (and nigh on impossible to find on its own).
The only aftermarket rear lens cap that I know fits the S-mount 2.1cm is the aluminium cap made by Hansa, and its now discontinued and sold out. The plastic CV rear lens caps for the external S and SC mount lenses don't fit as they're not deep enough. So DIY is the only option now.
marcr1230
Well-known
seems like this is a perfect task for a 3D printer - if you need one
Not so sure if its important to get, but the rear cap for the S-mount 2.1cm certainly is expensive to get (and nigh on impossible to find on its own).
The only aftermarket rear lens cap that I know fits the S-mount 2.1cm is the aluminium cap made by Hansa, and its now discontinued and sold out. The plastic CV rear lens caps for the external S and SC mount lenses don't fit as they're not deep enough. So DIY is the only option now.
enasniearth
Well-known
Rear cap
Rear cap
The prewar Zeiss biogon rear cap is very deep and may fit ,
Or try one from a Jupiter biogon .
Post war Zeiss caps marked Stuttgart are not as deep as prewar variety .
The prewar is a heavy chrome type marked Zeiss jena .
Rear cap
The prewar Zeiss biogon rear cap is very deep and may fit ,
Or try one from a Jupiter biogon .
Post war Zeiss caps marked Stuttgart are not as deep as prewar variety .
The prewar is a heavy chrome type marked Zeiss jena .
Share:
-
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.