Bessa III/Fuji GH667 - durability of black vs. silver finish?

toronto416

Newbie
Local time
1:21 PM
Joined
Sep 4, 2011
Messages
5
The Voigtlanber Bessa III and Fuji GH667 MF 6x7 rangefinder cameras, with either 80 or 55mm lenses, are made in the same Cosina factory in Japan and branded as Fuji (with a silver finish) or Voigtlander (with a black finish). Other than cosmetics, both versions at each focal length are identical.​


As there is no distributor in Canada, I would have to order either from the US or from the UK, and hence both finishes would be availble to me.​


I am very tempted by the wide version with a 55mm lens, and I am not sure which finish is preferable and which is more durable.​


Silver is very classic looking, but black would be more unobtrusive for street shooting (but this is not my prime activity).​


Does anyone have any opinions about the two choices of finish regarding quality or durability?​


Thanks!​
 
I don't know about the finish, but I do know that the Fujifilm versions are cheaper than the Voigtlander versions. So unless that's changed, I'd go with the silver.
 
I went for the Fuji version 1 year ago. (It is GF670, not GH667).
It was $400 cheaper than the Voigtlander then, so it was a good reason for me.
I love the camera, quite robust mechanism.
 
According to the UK distributor:

"The Voigtlander Black body is powder coat and the Fuji Silver body is silver paint".

Powder coat is a more durable finish than paint.
 
Silver is very classic looking, but black would be more unobtrusive for street shooting​


You're going to walk around with a honking medium format bellows camera in front of your face. Do you really believe that you'll be more unobtrusive if it's black?​
 
Do you really believe that you'll be more unobtrusive if it's black?

Maybe at night because he can completely hide behind it? 😉

In any case, I used to have the black Bessa III (at the time you could only get the Fuji in Japan) and liked the finish. It must've been quite robust as I didn't get any scratches on it. That being said, for the price difference I'd go with the Fuji today.
 
I have the GF670; the finish is durable enough. The main durability concern is the mechanism that holds the lens in position when extended. The hinges get damaged easily if you are not careful and forget to set the focusing ring to infinity before trying to fold it back in. Don't drop it or hit anything while the lens door is open.

That said, I couldn't be happier with the camera.
 
Excellent!

The wide angle version has a fixed (non-folding) 55mm lens and hence it sounds like a fairly robust set-up.

With a black powdercoated finish and a 55mm lens, this should be a durable choice.
 
Looks like there isn't (yet) a Fujifilm version of the wide. Say, what does 55mm in medium format translate to in 35mm format in terms of angle of view? I forget....
 
As there is no distributor in Canada, I would have to order either from the US or from the UK, and hence both finishes would be availble to me.

Camtech in Montreal sells both, though it seems the 55mm version is in very short supply; Camtech has none at the moment. $ 2,245.00 (CAD) for the Bessa III www.camtech.com

http://www.bigcameraworkshops.com/ in Burlington is an authorized Voigtländer dealer. Neither of the two cameras show up on his website, and there are only a couple of C/V lenses listed. It would be worth emailing Rob.

Both places are good to deal with, and there's no customs BS to deal with. Canada Customs has had a lens I ordered from Popflash on its shelf since Sept. 11. Do they fondle the gear?

I've bought from both; no other connection.
 
Thanks. Apparently there is no longer a Voigtlander distributor in Canada, and Rob cannot obtain them. Until the importer/distributor issue is solved, Canadians have to order from either the US or the UK etc.
 
Back
Top Bottom