Having bought and L and then a T... I think the T is a natural replacement for the L, superior in every respect. While the L is considered a good low-cost way into wide-angle lenses, we may be a bit spoiled these days in "needing" a focusing aid of some kind.
In fact, look back at cameras both before and after WWII in which it was pretty common to expect the user to just estimate subject distance. Not just 35's either, but even 6x9 folders! One could buy an accessory clip-on RF as an "upgrade" or just use a knotted/calibrated string for close-distance measuring.
My point is that the L is no worse off than the above, with a normal lens at moderate apertures and guessed distances. Easier of course with wider lenses. And the Bessa-T adds a very accurate rangefinder, addressing any residual scale-focus concerns.
Both the L and T have the meter diodes located on the upper rear of the body where they're easily seen while looking through an accessory viewfinder. They're also easily (and usefully) seen without the camera at your eye, unlike the R and R2!
I like the Bessa-T a lot. I also like to have two each of favored items, so with today's prices I really wish I could justify a second T. I have to remind myself "I am NOT a collector!" Repeat 100 times. After all, I do have that L, and an M2, and a CLE, so it's not like I'm desperate for another Leica-mount RF. Sigh. :-/
I think the T is a fine "everyday" shooter, an excellent choice "on the street." The big bright accessory viewfinders make it quick and easy to frame a fleeting subject. The 35mm focal length is a great choice for this, and in decent light one can do fine with hyperfocal/scale focusing. The RF is there for close-in with fast lenses wide open if needed, and otherwise when you have the time. The rear-mounted diodes make it easy to set exposure inconspicuously. And the camera with viewer mounted has an old-fashioned funky look that may be a conversation starter too.
