binomistar-g
Newbie
Hi, I recently bought what seems to be black Leica III with a Summar. It wasn't too expensive so I gave it a shot. When I examined it, it became clear that the serial number was ridiculously low for a Leica III. I checked it on Stephen Gandy's list and it seems that this badge were all Leica I.
There's also an added flash socked in the back, which the seller claimed it was factory modified. I didn't really believe this, but, whatever, I thought.
Could this really be an upgraded Leica I? The more I look at it, the fishier it smells.
There's also an added flash socked in the back, which the seller claimed it was factory modified. I didn't really believe this, but, whatever, I thought.
Could this really be an upgraded Leica I? The more I look at it, the fishier it smells.
MikeL
Go Fish
!
!
It looks like the Standard I have that had been upgraded to a III, but mine has the normal III shutter dial.
I haven't seen a III top plate with the IIIf shutter speed dial and markings. And the rewind release lever looks odd. Hope someone can help more!
!
It looks like the Standard I have that had been upgraded to a III, but mine has the normal III shutter dial.
I haven't seen a III top plate with the IIIf shutter speed dial and markings. And the rewind release lever looks odd. Hope someone can help more!
Mr_Flibble
In Tabulas Argenteas Refero
Post-war upgrade of a Leica I to IIIa-sync.
The rewind lever is correct for a IIIa.
The rewind lever is correct for a IIIa.
MikeL
Go Fish
Thanks Mr. Fibble, I shoulda looked at the conversion thread first.
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showpost.php?p=834558&postcount=16
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showpost.php?p=834558&postcount=16
colyn
ישו משיח
It's a genuine Leica with a genuine Leica upgrade..
Leica offered this upgrade on all pre-IIIf models except the Leica-O..
Leica offered this upgrade on all pre-IIIf models except the Leica-O..
Vince Lupo
Whatever
I used to have one like that -- they're really beautiful!
Dralowid
Michael
Very nice IIIa syn. Look for them in the 'conversions' thread, 111146 is mine and part of a collection of black conversions that I still have. Here's an old pic of some.
Michael
Scan-130412-0001 by dralowid, on Flickr
Michael
Scan-130412-0001 by dralowid, on Flickrbinomistar-g
Newbie
But the serial... 10148
It looks too good to be true!
It looks too good to be true!
Erik van Straten
Veteran
It is a post war conversion. The black ones are irresistible.
Erik.
Erik.
goamules
Well-known
Do you realize that when Leica upgraded older cameras, they used the same serial number the camera started with. Why do you think it's too good to be true? I'm too lazy to go looking up serial numbers right now...
johannielscom
Snorting silver salts
What the other guys said, a Leica I to IIIa-syn conversion.
With a Summar (what serial number? Possible original combo!?) attached, I wonder what 'not too expensive' actually translates to, number-wise...
With a Summar (what serial number? Possible original combo!?) attached, I wonder what 'not too expensive' actually translates to, number-wise...
Ronald M
Veteran
Most all fakes have a fed pointed focusing cam follower rather than a roller.
If a roller is there, I would go with the conversion.
If a roller is there, I would go with the conversion.
rfaspen
[insert pithy phrase here]
Sure looks like a conversion to me. And a nice looking one too. Alas, I have no black Barnacks in my cupboard, so I'm envious