grissom
Newbie
hi all - new here, been unsuccessful in finding info on this particular issue I'm having elsewhere, so figured I would register and pose the question.
I've just recently gotten a QL17 GIII from an ebay seller who'd only tested it in manual mode (it was priced accordingly), and I can't get the meter working. did the reading on battery solutions and went with the hearing aid option (rayovac 675, zinc air, 1.45v) and got the rubber ring to keep them in place. the battery check lights up, so I assume the meter is getting power, but the needle just sits at f/5.6 no matter the light or the shutter speed with the aperture ring on A. the shutter does fire, but only at that aperture. am I missing something here or is the meter just cooked?
moreover, is there something about these cameras / this metering system that causes them to burn out easily? I see plenty of confirmed no-good meters on ebay on otherwise decent shape cameras, and I'm wondering what would've done it on my copy as well. it's in great condition cosmetically and everything else seems to function like new.
ultimately not the end of the world of course - this camera is plenty of fun to shoot manually - but I would like to have a working auto-exposure mode if I could. would be curious to hear anyone's insight!
I've just recently gotten a QL17 GIII from an ebay seller who'd only tested it in manual mode (it was priced accordingly), and I can't get the meter working. did the reading on battery solutions and went with the hearing aid option (rayovac 675, zinc air, 1.45v) and got the rubber ring to keep them in place. the battery check lights up, so I assume the meter is getting power, but the needle just sits at f/5.6 no matter the light or the shutter speed with the aperture ring on A. the shutter does fire, but only at that aperture. am I missing something here or is the meter just cooked?
moreover, is there something about these cameras / this metering system that causes them to burn out easily? I see plenty of confirmed no-good meters on ebay on otherwise decent shape cameras, and I'm wondering what would've done it on my copy as well. it's in great condition cosmetically and everything else seems to function like new.
ultimately not the end of the world of course - this camera is plenty of fun to shoot manually - but I would like to have a working auto-exposure mode if I could. would be curious to hear anyone's insight!