Canon 28mm f/3.5 LTM

naruto

GASitis.. finally cured?
Local time
7:07 PM
Joined
Mar 26, 2007
Messages
623
the virus is catching on. I finally scored a 28LTM at the evil-bay site for cheap.

Here are some shots with Neopan 100 in Xtol 1+3. All shots at around 1/15 f/5.6.

3112175640_df6f6e1582.jpg


3111342225_382789c903.jpg


3112173984_d1fa2dacb9.jpg


It was a farewell party for a couple of friends...
3111340655_c90e802e26.jpg


3111339815_c757be4e66.jpg
 
Rather too much light area, Naruto. Hadn't you better remove the WTB from your signature? I used to have a Canon 28/2.8. Biting sort of fellow.

yeah Mukul, now that I have seen it on a PC monitor it does look excessively bright. If I ever get to Delhi on my trip back home, I'll ping you. 🙂

taken in Little India @SG🙂

yeah. you from SG too?
 
ok, here are some more I changed the processing a bit. somehow the pics seem duller on my mac.

3114936660_10de25f770.jpg


3114106395_4d940f9625.jpg


this is my fav out of the series.
3114935558_9886601dc3.jpg
 
If you scanned prints, they need more exposure. I am Delhi 9873553167. Adequate notice, a meal. Short notice, your choice from a limited selection of potables.
 
Here is an image taken by my Canon 28mm/3.5 [color film]:
145929-R1-33-33.jpg
.

Here is another color image;
145925-R1-28-29.jpg


The old lens is sharp and reasonably contrasty, maybe on the low side.

145930-R1-05-4A.jpg
 
Last edited:
Plunked down a bit more than I should have for mine, but it's a fine lens. Re: overexposure - I shoot all my 400 film at 200 and get nice results 70% of the time. For those that seem too washed out, I use PS to copy the background to a new layer, and alter the opacity of the copy layer until I get the "exposure" I need. Works like a charm and no muddy shadows.
 
Back
Top Bottom